sabas123

37 ms·

151.
by sabas123 6y ago
Can somebody explain what it means to hold the IP or rights of any of these standards?
152.
by sabas123 6y ago
It was a good read, thank you for sharing. > "It was an interesting experience exchanging cultures. It became dramatically clear how much proofs depend on the audience. We prove things in a social context and address them to a certa
153.
by sabas123 6y ago
I don't get this comment, it feels like "just follow a master in security lmao".
154.
by sabas123 6y ago
You know that taxes are a major part of research funding in the EU right? Also Europe does has a nack for immense projects like LHC or ITER.
155.
by sabas123 6y ago
http://bash.org/?362137 karma?
156.
by sabas123 6y ago
This is one thing that I really have to credit MS for doing right.
157.
by sabas123 6y ago
What if I have no reasonable way of fully understanding the code nor being able to judge the author on their trustworthiness (even disregarding that this isn't constant). As a community we need to accept that the above mentioned DOES h
158.
by sabas123 6y ago
Could you give a layman overview of how ASML is dependent on these companies and what the geo-political/econmic shifts would be?
159.
by sabas123 6y ago
Those were called "click" sites if I'm not mistaken
160.
by sabas123 7y ago
As if that is necessarily a bad thing. It also means that it helps me defend against software imposing as me.
161.
by sabas123 7y ago
What does being a CS major having to do with being pro-DRM? Isn't it mainly an economic/philosophical standpoint on copyright?
162.
by sabas123 7y ago
> If your quote is truly what's happening in your life, I'm sorry. That sounds miserable, in posting here: I can't tell why you shared that. If I was your manager, is this a recent development and you need time to process?
163.
by sabas123 7y ago
Implying that we ever found ourselves before.
164.
by sabas123 7y ago
Why would you make such a long post if you ignore OP's entire premise? Is it wrong for somebody to value privacy and is it moral to let the ability to act upon that be decided by if you have enough money to survive?
165.
by sabas123 7y ago
Can't you similarly say that category theory is just us abstracting previously known knowledge like we do with software?
166.
by sabas123 7y ago
As somebody only used to CS research, can any explain to me how much the costs of reproducing is considered into unreproducibility?
167.
by sabas123 7y ago
And I've see it work out brilliantly
168.
by sabas123 7y ago
As somebody who was top ~2% in Starcraft I got heavily triggered until this part >The key insight from Starcraft is that you need to be constantly testing and adjusting your hypothesis by scouting your opponent, all while continually exe
169.
by sabas123 7y ago
This reminds me of Tribes Ascend snipers wanting to play with bigger latency because the adjustment would help them more than the lower ping.
170.
by sabas123 7y ago
> I appreciate the feedback though. I know this is just one voice of many, but it's also what I experienced. I think it's up to the viewer to decide if my experience is applicable. How do you feel comfortable spreading your ow
171.
by sabas123 7y ago
Not necessarily, Day[9] (one of the best US starcraft 1 players) had a great podcast where he explained why playing against worse players can still be massively helpful. http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/intrigue/Day
172.
by sabas123 7y ago
ISA's can get very complex very fast, so I would suggest, like the author wrote down in next sentence, to realize that some complexity is best left for a later time. Now that I think about it, ISA's/assembly are a really good
173.
by sabas123 7y ago
The problem is that no matter which metric you choose, I can pick another one leading me to have opposite outcomes in a manner that you cannot argue with. The importance of your objective metric will still be subjective based on how importa
174.
by sabas123 7y ago
Could he only cares about correctness, then it becomes the opposite of ironic.
175.
by sabas123 7y ago
The metric chosen here is still arbitrary, why would the number of interfaces be more important than the number of the amount of interconnected interfaces? It is still subjective and hence simplicity is still subjective too
176.
by sabas123 7y ago
If bad genes are sufficient to make you depressed, then that doesn't imply they are also sufficient for making you any more happy in any point in time.
177.
by sabas123 7y ago
> It is hand waving simplicity against the complex reality of biological limitations. Some people simply have more endurance for the suffering of life, better motivation or better opportunity and environment. I expected the general popul
178.
by sabas123 7y ago
But fuck this world if mastering your craft turns out to be just as stressful and painful as seeking happiness from material wealth.
179.
by sabas123 7y ago
It also is much more than most politicians and ministers. Especially the latter are typically way more influential imo.
180.
by sabas123 7y ago
Did you ever felt like you would be wasting potential?

More ›