3 ms·
Could you give a layman overview of how ASML is dependent on these companies and what the geo-political/econmic shifts would be?
by sabas123 6y ago
Could you give a layman overview of how ASML is dependent on these companies and what the geo-political/econmic shifts would be?
- brennanpeterson 6y agoThat is a big topic. Basically, though, a process flow is deposition, track, litho, etch, clean, deposition, cmp, metro, inspect (lots of steps vary, but these are the basics) You need each of these to work. Deposition: Lam, Applied, TELand then Wonik, ASM, and others Track: TEL Litho: ASML Etch: Lam, Applied, TEL CMP: Ebara, Applied Metro: Onto, KLA, Hitachi Inspect: KLa, Applied There are more, and I missed a bit, but basically, you need to tick off each of these layers, and quite often with the best at each. ASML cannot make wafers for anyone without someone doing all the other parts. And really, that is true for all these companies. There is a best of breed and selection bias that makes each system imperfectly interchangeable. But you can also see that ASML is the sole true monopoly. So if they are out, nothing works. There are plausible workarounds otherwise.not always easy or cost effective, but plausible in most cases. ASML needs the rest of the infrastructure to sell tools. And likewise, everyone needs ASML to deliver, or there is no new node....