4 ms·
The metric chosen here is still arbitrary, why would the number of interfaces be more important than the number of the amount of interconnected interfaces? It i
by sabas123 7y ago
The metric chosen here is still arbitrary, why would the number of interfaces be more important than the number of the amount of interconnected interfaces? It is still subjective and hence simplicity is still subjective too
- austincheney 7y agoWhen a metric is quantifiable with numbers it is objective. It may not be the best tool for the job or even valid at all, but it is still objective. Subjectivity, on the other hand, means to prioritize a content or bias above its measures.
- sabas123 7y agoThe problem is that no matter which metric you choose, I can pick another one leading me to have opposite outcomes in a manner that you cannot argue with. The importance of your objective metric will still be subjective based on how important I think each metric system is. Making the entire thing subjective.
- austincheney 7y agoYou are confusing cause and effect. The measure itself is the objective part. What you do or what you believe from that number is the subjective part. If objectivity were important to you then you would use many measures.