Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
s_baby
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
301.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
On a sidenote, her food blog looks delicious.
302.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Can someone explain to me why a company would be priced below its "fundamentals"?
303.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Investment of someone elses money. To someone out there this is a rational risk to take.
304.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Also the possibility of finding new life forms. We've found life drilling several miles down. How much further does it go?
305.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Isn't Mozilla funded by Google?
306.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Match according to spring count and type. The profit margin at a place like Mattress Firm is ~50%. They are hungry for a sale and will bid for your purchase.
307.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
After developing neck+back pain and doing many hours of research this is the solution I arrived at as well. I use an Ikea firm foam bed with a 2.5" memory foam on top. This ends up giving the support of a "medium-firm" many doctors advoca
308.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>Secondly, Google holds a large percentage of the-mobile market through the official Android so anti-trust is listening. A clear case of anti-competitive behavior since Google would not be able to control the non-official forks. The who
309.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>Looks great, but ignores the fact that transistors don’t scale like they used to. Remember, the point of near-threshold voltage and the research into replacing silicon is intended to move the bar forward bit by bit, not to re-enable th
310.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
In other words put the hardware in hipster glasses.
311.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Your point is taken but I don't think OP meant sentients is literally magic but that it is essentially a blackbox system to our constructs.
312.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>Are you using big words just for the sake of appearing knowledgable? I'm sorry your highness. I didn't realize I'm speaking to an authority here. >Causation from particle-wave interactions". What do you mean by this? I mean saying
313.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
It's called the "hard problem" of consciousness. In theory, you can map causation from particle-wave interactions to experiential states but that doesn't provide an explanatory ontology. It's a matter of having a valid data type. No data
314.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Something to keep in mind when the blogosphere lights up about how STEM is a "boy's club". It's not that there isn't merit to gender issues in STEM. It's that the dialogue is manufactured by people whose goals aren't egalitarian. If you
315.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
According to Warren Farrell NYTimes is systematic and deliberate in perpetuating misandry. This is coming from a man who was both a founding member in a major feminist organization(N.O.W) and a writer for the NYTimes. http://www.ifeminist
316.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
This is a good idea but why the limit of 30 or strict requirements? It's not like this program using up limited school resources like Flashpoint.
317.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>agpen is criticizing boys' clubs, a term that encapsulates a certain culture, behaviors, and set of beliefs. What are these cultures, behaviors, and beliefs exactly? To me, boy's club is another rhetorically nebulous term like patriarc
318.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Your statement is more sensible and on the fence. She's implying men are the root of women's problems in tech. That there is a conspiracy to marginalize. Women have broken into countless so-called "boys clubs". Doctors, lawyers, marketin
319.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
The slut shaming is very ironic.
320.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Proof? Some research suggests women are turned off from the "hard" sciences before they reach high school. It's likely a factor but you're putting the cart before the horse.
321.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
True. Now enjoy spending thousands of dollars making your case in court.
322.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>Just because people with axes to grind can use gender as a smear (an inept one, in this case) to paint someone as a sexist, doesn't make it right to imply we as males are somehow being attacked or victimized, or could be in the future.
323.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
I agree with your sentiment about what feminism is at its best but you're sugar coating the historical facts. 2nd wave feminism approaches gender roles as a zero sum game. They systematically marginalize any perspective on males that does
324.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
That was very much the goal of "Systems Theory"[1]. The problem is it's focused on "natural systems" with quantitative relationships. The work has fallen short in capturing phenomenological relationships. I think Wilber's AQAL ontology co
325.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>This may be a mathematician's bias, but Category Theory is somewhat underwhelming because you can't really do anything with it. It's actually too abstract It seems Category Theory might one day be useful in ordering "Upper Level Ontolo
326.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
Understanding variables is a hallmark of the "formal operational" stage of development.[1] It's the same reason why we hear some people "just don't get" programming. Same reason why languages like LOGO avoid this construct. If grasping Al
327.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>It's all too easy to become the same ego you were before, only now with a spiritual varnish. In my observation, there is a lot of rationalization around this. Can you think of anything more self-centered and intoxicating then conflatin
328.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
>On the contrary, to the extent that the self appears there at all, it is to be effaced. Within the context of Theravada. Mahayana embraces the "small" self. All Buddhist acts of compassion are anchored in self-interest. Just how you
329.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
As a Buddhist maybe not. Buddhism and Enlightenment Era ideology are both anchored in the idea of the "self". There's a great synergy between the two. To get what I mean look at the former CEO of Whole Foods, John Mackey. The staunchest
330.
▲
by
s_baby
14y ago
I agree, the ratio is so skewed that the possibility of legitimate discrimination should be considered. But consider this. We're experiencing the first generation of men that will be less educated than their fathers. Women are outpacing m
More ›