s73v3r_

77 ms·

781.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
That works for the rinky dink little file browser you put up on Github. It does not work for a project of this scale. Any core contributor who is unwilling to consider that point and treat this like a professional needs to step down, now.
782.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Wow. They can't bother to have people working in customer service, and now they can't even bother to have people working on where they invest their money? Please tell me that the execs are next to be automated.
783.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
No, because it is correct. I do not buy for one single second this idea that all opinions are equally valid and equally deserving. That is patently false, and I will not fall into the trap of false equivalence.
784.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I can understand that. I just don't want to have a reason why my employer could call me in off hours, nor for them to claim ownership of stuff I've done.
785.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
But then you're the unethical one, here.
786.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
That's not your box, though. It's your employers.
787.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
There are other GPU processor cores out there. Manufacturers can and do license the designs and switch out GPU cores.
788.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
First of all, I wholeheartedly reject the idea that giving to a civil rights organization should be treated the same as giving to an organization meant to downplay climate change. Second, without the information that large, rich people and
789.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Yes, it is" No, it isn't. That's why they call it "disable" and not "delete".
790.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"I'm a backer and I have no problem with this" That's fine that you're happy with what they're doing. Other people aren't, and they should be able to get their money back when the direction went somewhere
791.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
If arbitration really is a better solution, then people will choose to go that route themselves, instead of being forced into it by a company trying to get more favorable results.
792.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
No, he did not get his constitutional right to petition his government for redress. He was denied this because a company added a clause forcing people to go into the private justice system. A clause that never, ever, ever should be enforcea
793.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Mandatory arbitration clauses need to be eliminated. There is absolutely no valid use of them anywhere.
794.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"This fine is an assault on open source" Considering the cause of the fine is all of the non-open source bits Google adds on, I don't see how one can make a statement like that with a straight face. "In any other context
795.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Then maybe we should let those companies go under. Someone else will come along and iterate on that idea, and given the benefit of seeing what happened before, they'll be in a better position to make themselves profitable.
796.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Because they're not abusing any position of theirs to compel OEMs to bundle more of their apps. They also don't have anywhere near a monopoly position.
797.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
And that's the same thing Microsoft did with IE and Windows.
798.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Disable is not delete.
799.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"Many preinstalled apps that aren't essential are just a stub" I've never seen this. Just about every preinstalled app on the phones I've had are the actual app.
800.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
Hell, in light of the factory that the NRA was caught colluding with a Russian National, it's very much not true.
801.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
The numbers were very much a part of the comment, and thus it is quite valid to guarantee you're still operating in reality when you make claims like that. Your 32 years to get $30,000 makes a lot of assumptions. One, that in 32 years
802.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"No one said anything about dehumanization." I did. "It shouldn't be your prerogative to see comments like that deleted because you disagree with them." It absolutely should be everyone's prerogative here to se
803.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I strongly disagree that it's no one's business where that money is going. That money is used to influence public policy, which can have a very real effect on me and my life. I think it should be very public knowledge that, a grou
804.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
See, I completely disagree. I don't believe the first amendment means that money is speech, nor that a rich person is entitled to more speech than anyone else.
805.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
NO. Again, a blockchain is not doing anything of value there that cannot be done easier and simpler with traditional methods.
806.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
The current incarnation of the military has done exactly nothing to protect me, and likely has taken actions to make things more dangerous for me.
807.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
If you think that the source of the problem is people wasting money on other things, then you don't have a sufficient grasp on the problem to be able to issue that kind of advice.
808.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I strongly disagree, mainly because that line of thought has no basis in reality, and allowing it to persist like this encourages the dehumanization of the lower classes. It's not a reasonable sentiment in the least.
809.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
I guarantee you that no one set out with that course of actions in mind.
810.
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"We need to do a better job of framing things like "if you switch to a worse phone plan and save $10 per month to invest, you will probably have something around $30,000 in 30 years while only investing $3,600."." Prove

More ›