3 ms·
No, he did not get his constitutional right to petition his government for redress. He was denied this because a company added a clause forcing people to go int
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
No, he did not get his constitutional right to petition his government for redress. He was denied this because a company added a clause forcing people to go into the private justice system. A clause that never, ever, ever should be enforceable, because it is entirely unconscionable.
The system did NOT work.
- ABCLAW 8y agoYes he did. He was denied his right to redress because the judge thought the case wasn't worth enough to be worth his time, wrote a very dismissive ruling and then hoped it wouldn't be appealed so his shitty ruling wouldn't be torn apart. This isn't a 'the sky is falling' situation. This is a judge cutting a corner to get to cases he views as more important.