runtime_terror

4 ms·

31.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
Are you kidding? It went down constantly for months and had tons of bugs and regressions
32.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
What sources say this besides the LLM companies themselves? Even if true, they also have to account for training costs or else they'll never break even.
33.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
Then why doesn't Iran have the "right" to fight back as well?
34.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
Yes but in this case Israel and US were the aggressors. If the IRGC benefits from this conflict, that's the sole fault of Israel and the US
35.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
You mean the countries the US has physically and economically attacked for decades having resentment for that? As for Vietnam, they're suffering from tariffs, why are you assuming they're also no negatively affected by the Trump a
36.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
So if the US was invaded we wouldn't be justified in fighting back?
37.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
Why do we think it's our job to intervene in other countries like this? And if we wanted to help another country, working with the international community should be the only approach we take. We've spent many decades overthrowing
38.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
> AI costs aren't going to stay this high Why do you feel this way? Are you talking about frontier models from US companies or smaller weight open source models? From the perspective of US companies, it seems pretty clear they'
39.
by runtime_terror 2mo ago
So, illegally, got it
40.
by runtime_terror 3mo ago
If by "public domain data" you mean stealing ungodly amounts of copyrighted works then sure
41.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Lemme guess, Nick Shirley is your favorite journalist?
42.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
The amount invested into AI companies is no where near anything we've ever seen before. It's apples to oranges.
43.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
I'm amazed people still believe this narrative after all the clear evidence to the contrary
44.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Curious; why is that an issue?
45.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Batteries, having a mixed grid of renewables, and new advances in nuclear solves this
46.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
You've got to be kidding? "AI" data centers consume massive amounts of energy per square foot, have been caught using LNG generators for power, have polluted ground water, material usage, habitat destruction, etc How about yo
47.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Here you go: Harvard University Law Press: https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/extracting-profits-from-the-pub... Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-ai-data-centers-elec... CNBC: https:&#x2
48.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Not sure how to answer this. It's pretty well documented that datacenters (esp the AI variety) are offloading grid expenses to customers as higher baseline costs. The issue is that these DCs are not paying for the cost of the necessary
49.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Local labor is often not used to build them. Most of these companies have crews they bring in during build out. Plus the actual setup of the facility is highly skilled: everyone is imported. The only local jobs we're talking about woul
50.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
You really think an individual employee trying to help a customer when they likely have little impact on org wide issues like how customer support is run is tarpitting? Seems a bit uncharitable
51.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
You can't be serious? I hope I'm just missing the joke To have an equivalent capacity of DCs in space would require such astronomical costs there is 0 chance it would be profitable esp considering how fast GPUs deprecate How about
52.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
So by your logic if a massive company came and said they want to setup an oil refinery or coal power plant you'd say they should say yes just because they could get tax revenue? You always have to way the pros and cons of such massive
53.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Minimal impact as defined by whom? I'm sure they impact those that live around them plenty as well as the price on electricity for those on the same grid. They provide mostly temporary jobs (and majority imported to boot), after constr
54.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
You'd be forever my hero if you solve the rate limiting thing! One time I couldn't fix a production issue because I opened too many tabs. Thanks Brandon!
55.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Are you talking backup generator vs solar for a home? If so, solar continually supplies power without paying for an input vs a backup generator which is only meant to run infrequently and is costly to run and requires you to pay for inputs
56.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Counter point; good enough is often... good enough Go is the best example of this; it's boring but incredible stable and consistent
57.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
For your first question: - The workers platform is quite pleasant to work with compared to competitors. - Globally deploying edge workers which have access to their many services (D1, R2, DO, etc) - Having the ability to assemble globally
58.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Vercel hired the Svelte team so I'm not too sure there's much of a difference https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29189144
59.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
The dashboard UX has improved a lot lately but one thing that drives me absolutely nuts is that I get rate limited all the time using it. For example, I had to recently change an env var we had on a handful of apps and opened them all into
60.
by runtime_terror 4mo ago
Bro energy is not water

More ›