rsp1984

73 ms·

691.
by rsp1984 11y ago
DotProduct -- Boston, MA or Wiesbaden, Germany == 1. Senior R&D Engineer in Computer Vision == We are looking for a software engineer with a strong 3D Computer Vision or Graphics background to join our R&D team. Interesting t
692.
by rsp1984 11y ago
I always wonder why sometimes the system finds faces and other elements in essentially untextured / homogeneous parts of images. Wouldn't there be some sort of "data term" in the energy functional that would suppress the
693.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Wow, these are way better than the Google Inceptionism originals.
694.
by rsp1984 11y ago
DotProduct -- Boston, MA or Wiesbaden, Germany == 1. Senior R&D Engineer in Computer Vision == == 2. Software Engineer in Mobile == == 1: We are looking for a software engineer with a strong 3D Computer Vision or Graphics
695.
by rsp1984 11y ago
> 1. Establish your track record as a top engineer. > 2. Lay out your specific future plans to solve their burning problems and objectives. As someone who's been into raise negotiations on both sides of the table I think the enti
696.
by rsp1984 11y ago
First, please don't downvote people who you simply disagree with. That's just bad style. > Also It is never ridiculous to let the people of a country decide especially on hard questions after the facts on the ground have change
697.
by rsp1984 11y ago
I don't understand your point. Their democratic mandate is to say no to Trioka terms. Great. That's what they did and it resulted in the situation we have now. If they continue down the path of their mandate it will result in Gree
698.
by rsp1984 11y ago
For everybody who's not been living under a rock for the last five years it was, and is, obvious that the choice is either to accept Troika terms or to leave the Eurozone. The current situation can't be a surprise for anyone , es
699.
by rsp1984 11y ago
What is actually happening here is that Tsipras is simply trying to save face. Attempting to get the Troika (EU, IMF, ECB) to bend in the negotiations was a suicide commando in the first place. Now he realizes that his plan failed and is tr
700.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Yes, that's a very good picture of things. Now the dependency vs redundancy issue comes in when two clusters are made modules. If they are mostly separated but still have some connections to each other the question is what to do with
701.
by rsp1984 11y ago
The article makes some very important points and it's certainly worth a read for every programmer. What the article misses to address explicitly however is that the whole redundancy vs. dependency conflict is caused by modularization.
702.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Even simpler: Just use a const variable instead of a constant literal in the caller code: const bool useWayA = true; int result = foo(a, b, useWayA); instead of int result = foo(a, b, true);
703.
by rsp1984 11y ago
You have some good points here but keep in mind that some of the things you mention (health care, education, etc..) are very US-centric and far less of an issue in other places such as Europe.
704.
by rsp1984 11y ago
DotProduct -- Boston, MA or Wiesbaden, Germany == 1. Senior R&D Engineer in Computer Vision == == 2. Software Engineer in Mobile == == 1: We are looking for a software engineer with a strong 3D Computer Vision or Graphics
705.
by rsp1984 11y ago
In my years of experience (both in big corporate R&D as well as startups) I've never seen a project fail because of the end product being too simple or not having enough features. However on the other hand I've seen countle
706.
by rsp1984 11y ago
I wonder what would happen if you train an RNN like described with, say, the scores of all of Mozart's Chamber Music and then let it generate new music from the learned pieces. How would it sound? Would it figure out beat? Chords? Harm
707.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Can you provide more details on this? It's where it gets interesting... :)
708.
by rsp1984 11y ago
> No voxels anymore So how do you represent geometry then? Mesh? SDF? Space tetrahedralization?
709.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Very cool! Are you doing this on the CPU or GPU?
710.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Since I happen to know the founder of Euclideon and the company a little bit I have to emphasize here that their tech was and is real. Sure in the videos it wasn't presented in a neutral academic setting but it's far from rigged a
711.
by rsp1984 11y ago
This sounds very cool but from what I understand from the article I guess it would require direct emitter-receiver visibility, i.e. turning around and facing away from the emitter wouldn't work. Similarly, if you used several emitters
712.
by rsp1984 11y ago
This btw is precisely what separates the good engineer from the great engineer: A good engineer can produce a good product under moderate time pressure but will accrue technical debt in critical spots if more time pressure is applied. The g
713.
by rsp1984 11y ago
From years of my experience, both in big corporate tech and startups, smart Engineers will always find business reasons to sell you their tech-debt free perfect rainbow unicorn architecture. Even worse, if you're then not equally tec
714.
Ask HN: Why are there so few law startups?
68 points by rsp1984 11y ago|67 comments
715.
by rsp1984 11y ago
In even simpler terms, the deal generated 200m in ad sales for "Hooli".
716.
by rsp1984 11y ago
All the right things have been said in other comments already, however I'd like to point out that the outcome for Peter, the angel investor is a little unclear from the article. It says: > Peter, while sad about the outcome, has dev
717.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Exactly. I was too afraid to ask actually and be downvoted and labeled totally uncool. So what is it? I'm still not smarter after reading the FAQ. A "Javascript Platform". Aha. What do I use it for and what problem does it so
718.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Cool, would you sell me the rights to it for, say, 1000 bucks? :-) Serioulsy though, no offense, but I don't think you could build one of these, nor do I think that anybody else on the planet could at this point. Of course it's al
719.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Yes it is my first exposure to this thought experiment and I do not have trouble understanding the thought experiment. I am just going ahead and applying some common sense and logic, to conclude that the argument is pretty much entirely the
720.
by rsp1984 11y ago
Yes, theoretically any action, no matter how small and remote, can eventually lead to harm of a human, i.e. the butterfly effect, but that's not what I meant. What I meant was that a machine capable of building a paper clip factory on

More ›