rpo3po

5 ms·

1.
by rpo3po 11y ago
This, too, begins with a false premise: that journalists are equally likely to seek out positive and negative stories, and to give both of them equal importance. That is a naive assumption, unfortunately, and the facts of reporting - bad ev
2.
by rpo3po 11y ago
And, potentially biased, from the Arstechnica side?? That's an understatement, to say the least. I can say, with a fair amount of certainty, that nearly every, if not every writer on the Arstechnica payroll, is absolutely biased toward
3.
by rpo3po 11y ago
The answer, which I'm confident that you know, based upon your allowance that perhaps the attorney is making a falsified claim, is that there is nothing, at that point. Charges for different crimes require different levels of evidence.
4.
by rpo3po 11y ago
Is it an insult or a plea for reasoning? No, I have a Bachelor's degree in CJ, but outside of that, if the primary issue is the determination to pursue charges, then what happens if there are no actions which precipitate charges?
5.
by rpo3po 11y ago
At this point, there is absolutely no evidence, beyond the defense attorney's claim, that the malicious software neither existed prior to him handing it over to the police department, nor that it was installed after the fact, by the de
6.
by rpo3po 12y ago
And I bet there's a decent mall near you with some sort of lounge-type area. I used to manage a retail wireless internet kiosk in a busy mall. We were near the food court, so prime location; we had 1,000 people walking by on any given
7.
by rpo3po 12y ago
How about the library? You'd have to whisper, or maybe have them read the instructions, but you'd probably have wifi. Maybe even make a couple code changes during downtime.