Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rosndo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
271.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
yucky, for whatever reason your comment is [dead], so I can’t reply to you directly. > I understand it she has been very vocal in her disdain for the Ukrainian Azov Battalion which our current President seems to be aligned with I think i
272.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Probably because all of the comments under this post containing those words were written by me? Why would it be a script? Are you questioning the truthfulness of my statements? Do you think I’m trying to misrepresent something?
273.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> This is the same Tulsi Gabbard who currently has security clearance that indicates that the US Government trusts her This is not true. Gabbard does not hold a security clearance, you are coming up with things. There is also zero chance
274.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
It’s worth noting that Turley is defending Gabbard who goes on holidays with actual Nazis of the SSNP.
275.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
It’s not an accusation, I’m just pointing out that there is in fact a very real scenario where making such statements would be treasonous. But again, Gabbard has a history of incredibly sketchy behaviour. I don’t think any criticism of her
276.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> It is a little bit of both influencing each other, but the system in London is definitely the killer app I’m super unconvinced this is true. I know many “oligarchs” living in London, most of them do not keep their money in the UK. I th
277.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> Criticizing the US war machine doesn't make one a traitor. Criticizing the US war machine on behalf of a foreign government might. Gabbard has a very sketchy track record, she traveled to Syria to meet with Assad as a part of a SS
278.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
I doubt it, it’s not a “no jury in the land” case, but it probably is a “no prosecutor in the land” case. In Swartz’s case it wasn’t at all obvious to an outsider how many people would be upset, but there certainly were big domestic interes
279.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
But no US or Canadian city can compete on quality of life even if you fully ignore all the financial infrastructure. Cities in the US or Canada that offer comparable accommodation, eating and shopping opportunities are pretty miserable plac
280.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
It demonstrates a long-term alignment with Russian foreign policy interests. I’m not saying that her hanging out with Assad is treasonous in itself, although it certainly says a lot about her character. Her choosing to hang out with Assad c
281.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Indian Accent on Manhattan is absolutely incredible, a modernist take on Indian cuisine. Great food, great cocktails. After covid forced them to close in London, I’m happy to fly across the Atlantic just to eat there.
282.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> I think this is also perhaps partly why Indian food has not established itself in the fine-dining scene in North America and Europe European fine-dining scene hasn’t entirely ignored Indian restaurants, UK has 8 Indian restaurants with
283.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
London is also popular because it is the best city in the world to live in if you have a lot of money. London has been very important for a very very long time. This may even play a bigger part than any regulatory environment, especially in
284.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
My main goal in this conversation wasn’t to advocate harming anybody. I’m genuinely curious why software should be special. It’s weird! OTOH I see this same pattern repeated over and over again in different communities. If you go to gaming
285.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
I think now we’re solidly in the same territory as regular economic sanctions, which will also cause more harm to the regular people than to those directly culpable for enabling the war. But I also think to some extent it’s only fair that t
286.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> This package does more harm to the McDonald's eating crowd.... This isn’t a videogame dropping wiper malware, but business software. So no, I don’t see how this is supposed to harm the McDonald’s eating crowd any more than sanctio
287.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
I did, what makes you think I didn’t? > Due to internet censorship there, one of the web services used to contact us securely was hosted on servers located inside Belarus This story is fucking crazy. Just think about it for a moment. A c
288.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Tulsi Gabbard certainly does not deserve the benefit of the doubt after her trip with a Syrian Social Nationalist party delegation to meet Assad in Syria.
289.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> Amazon buying MGM means that MGM films are very unlikely to be available on other streaming services, which certainly lessens competition. Not substantially, that’s the important detail.
290.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
I’m absolutely in favor of sanctions, as I am also in favor of this kind of “protestware”. To me the equivalence is obvious, malware is just another kind of economic sanction. >I won’t provide that because it’s bullshit Why is it bullshi
291.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Do you believe that the alternative of letting the Israelis bomb Iranian nuclear facilities would have been better? That’s what they would have done if not for Stuxnet.
292.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
So you also think that sanctions against Russia are evil? If not, what’s the big difference that makes Russia-targeted malware more evil than the vastly more destructive economic sanctions?
293.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
> This is disgusting and thoughtless, because it accomplishes nothing but alienating Russian or Belarusian users. It doesn’t attempt to spread the truth or convince people that yes, Russian forces really are committing war crimes. Killin
294.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Sanctions laws are just as opaque to the muggles as digital magic spells, also easily far more damaging than even the worst malware the world has seen.
295.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
So you don’t actually have anything intelligent to say on this topic? > but it’s all malware to those of us outside of the great game That’s hardly true, is it? Stuxnet didn’t even exist for those “not in the game”, whereas Wannacry and
296.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
What great cost? Stuxnet did exactly nothing to harm systems that it wasn’t specifically targeting.
297.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Hmm, a throwaway account with a single comment constructing a straw man to argue against western sanctions for the war. It’s simply an unfortunate reality that the Russian state can’t be punished for their actions without collateral damage.
298.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
I think your examples are terrible. Everything you listed is controlled by western companies or individuals. >OpenCV Intel, a US company >Redux I don’t think this was developed in Russia at any point, current maintainers appear to be
299.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
Why is open source special? Or are you against all the economic sanctions on Russia also? Do you oppose businesses pulling out of Russia despite not being legally required to do so? > They hurt innocent people. You cannot booby trap your
300.
▲
by
rosndo
5y ago
But that’s strictly not true, bordering on delusional. Geo-targeted malware that only runs on specific computers is not attacking the whole world.
More ›