roopeshv

17 ms·

121.
by roopeshv 14y ago
i am not addressing most parts of the answer, but this one part of the reply bugs me the most; "he wound up raping another member". Because this equates any sexual harassement with rape. Are you suggesting that someone would eventually rape
122.
by roopeshv 14y ago
did you listen to the talk
123.
by roopeshv 14y ago
in all fairness, that sentence is said more like a passing comment and not a discussion topic
124.
by roopeshv 14y ago
No matter how it is modified to fit the context, that is not how it's taken http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_tolerance
125.
by roopeshv 14y ago
because science focuses on repeatability and control. personal successes do not. Any thing that passes as science has been proven to a degree of certainity, by definition. Any science is good science because it's been proven, and then there
126.
by roopeshv 14y ago
from the CoC is fuck a sexual language?
127.
by roopeshv 14y ago
i am only here to look for a reference to "lighten up"
128.
by roopeshv 14y ago
i would say it's a difference, but opt-in is always a good way to go. I always (atleast, i think so) I make most optins consciously). I would say everyme has a good TOS/Priv Stmt, compared to google, if it says "this privacy policy stands f
129.
by roopeshv 14y ago
atleast from the way it is written; i guess sexism, racism, eliticism, trolls, may be some narcissism as well
130.
by roopeshv 14y ago
just law of large numbers at work
131.
by roopeshv 14y ago
their TOS refers to privacy policy. dont' read things in isolations and without context.
132.
by roopeshv 14y ago
No. it's not opt out. it's "how do you want to share it?". Tell me where exactly this "opt-out" is, i would like to know. No, I don't give permission by using the site. That's blatanly dishonest to say that. They already mention that alread
133.
by roopeshv 14y ago
No. it's not opt out. it's "how do you want to share it?". Tell me where exactly this "opt-out" is, i would like to know. No, I don't give permission by using the site. That's blatanly dishonest to say that. They already mention that alread
134.
by roopeshv 14y ago
http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/ read "information we share" section. google takes advertisers money to match, "not sell", the ads on your data. http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/ read "Your Content in our Serv
135.
by roopeshv 14y ago
http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/ please read "information we share" section
136.
by roopeshv 14y ago
if you don't agree, reply. don't downvote
137.
by roopeshv 14y ago
exactly like google's terms, minus the legalese
138.
by roopeshv 14y ago
why is this reply being downvoted? Damn it people, if you don't agree, reply. don't downvote. (EDIT: shawnc's answer was being downvoted at the time of writing, now its' in green)
139.
by roopeshv 14y ago
well, all those $5s add up when you buy enough apps, and that's the whole economics of the app market. you spend small amounts on enough apps, and you won't even realize how much you have spent compared to one time payment to all apps as a
140.
by roopeshv 14y ago
to the people who downvoted: downvoting is not the way to say you disagree.
141.
by roopeshv 14y ago
yes, it is a random person. an engineer in facebook is also a random person. what you are confusing a random person with is person on higher rung of career ladder
142.
by roopeshv 14y ago
i stopped reading articles with "brogrammer" in them. it's overused to the point of absurdity right now.
143.
by roopeshv 14y ago
it's the code word for "any interaction with women i do not approve of"
144.
by roopeshv 14y ago
i would like to know what is a healthy grieving process. Any correlation made by glieck with his way of living is purely his own interpretation of things, and not feynman's. So, you idea that the idea of grief not being repressed doesn't st
145.
by roopeshv 14y ago
As much as we need compassion, let not make cases for clinics and making sheep out of everyone. Consider this for size, the exact same article replacing compassion with gullibility (and few changed sentences) to make the exact same case. ==
146.
by roopeshv 14y ago
actually he didn't repress his grief. he understood that grief for her doesn't change that she's dead, and other people bugging him about her death doesn't make it any better. So he decides he might as well just continue doing what he was d
147.
by roopeshv 14y ago
yes. he does say "he talks to her", but explains that he knows she's dead, and he only talks to the thought of her, rather than seeing her. that's one seriously funny section of his book.
148.
by roopeshv 14y ago
wait. why is this being downvoted?
149.
by roopeshv 14y ago
i think the point factorial is making is: this doesn't account the hours, and input one puts in, but it's just straight out how much for same position (not same job). but i paraphrase
150.
by roopeshv 14y ago
first you open your eyes

More ›