ronjouch

11 ms·

91.
by ronjouch 5y ago
a
92.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Okay, thanks for the precise reply; makes sense for CoreML. Bookmarking your site, will give your app a try when my trusty iPhone 6 breaks and I get a newer one. Take care.
93.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Note: requires iOS 14. I would have liked to give it a try, and pay if it proves superior to Apple's "Music Memos", but I can't, as I run an iPhone 6 / iOS 12 that is still very functional and security-patched by Ap
94.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Not OP, but happy fish user too. For me, yes I still write my scripts in hashbanged (ba)sh scripts; the only fish I write is my config.fish. Fish might be an objectively better language, I don't want to learn it and prefer keeping writ
95.
by ronjouch 5y ago
iOS app "Requires iOS 13 or later" :-/ . Too bad I can't use this on my still functional-and-receiving-security-upgrades iPhone 6. I suspect an overlap between the population enjoying birds and the population not buyin
96.
by ronjouch 5y ago
I couldn't find one and am considering working on a restoration. See thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27865583 EDIT see also https://www.e-rcps.com/gripes/
97.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Sure, thanks! Ping me at ronan foo jouchet bar fr . Will get in touch if I follow-up on making this happen.
98.
by ronjouch 5y ago
> Assuming you are correct that the earlier edition is truly out of copyright Given that it is: - A US Gov document (see other comment about it) - From 1945 (so, from 1923-1963) and without an explicit Copyright symbol on the document
99.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Thanks and thanks for the link; didn't know about this sub-case. Repeating a point of my original question, in case you have something to say about it: "112 gripes" was published in 1945, thus sites like https://ww
100.
by ronjouch 5y ago
What's the copyright situation of this book? Say I want to restore it, clean it up, and publish a nice epub (using as source the PDF already linked in a comment here). Is it copyright infringement, or is its copyright expired now? &quo
101.
by ronjouch 5y ago
I understand the sentiment, but disagree with it in the case we're talking about, for reasons just as factual and pragmatic as yours. See my reply at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27056751
102.
by ronjouch 5y ago
And I am a fan of making such functionality part of the browser :P : one less addon to manage & trust! Aside: the amount of insecure code in addons is scary, see https://palant.info/categories/security/ , not
103.
by ronjouch 5y ago
To you and sibling comment: oooookay, you're thinking from the position of an obfuscated link sharer/sender, not receiver. You want ClearURLs (or something else) to always resolve to a canonical link, so that you're easily ab
104.
by ronjouch 5y ago
I fail to understand how you'd "unmask" a backend-obfuscated URL (where you just have an ID, and there's no way to get the target URL by just looking at the URL) without opening the URL, defeating the purpose of improvin
105.
by ronjouch 5y ago
This is realistically solvable. 1. First, by Mozilla analysts & developers making a good job at rolling out a potential implementation in a safe progressive way, with the easiest stuff first (`fbclid`, `gclid`, etc), and then going deep
106.
by ronjouch 5y ago
See sibling comment from gorhill.
107.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Thanks gorhill! Testing these lists as replacement to ClearURLs now. Hope they make their way into the easy-to-enable default/stock lists. One by-the-way question: how can I "discover" such 3rd-party lists? Is there a place d
108.
by ronjouch 5y ago
Searching a bit, I find in https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/760 and https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/1356 that uBlock Origin offers filt
109.
by ronjouch 5y ago
I'd love if Firefox's built-in Tracking Protection did without an addon the job ClearURLs does, so two months ago I created Bug 1697982: "Firefox Tracking Protection should protect against URL/queryparam-based tracking
110.
by ronjouch 5y ago
> "They try to get away from that model, though. Not very successfully [...], but they try." Honest question: do they? What evidence supports the assertion that they do try? I haven't seen any story suggesting Mozilla is
111.
by ronjouch 6y ago
How do you quantify "more"? If you mean "by length of blocklist", is the number of rules a good metric to evaluate a filter list? In years of using the built-in "EasyList Cookie" list, I've: 1. Never seen
112.
by ronjouch 6y ago
AFAIK, Firefox does, if you're running the beta/nightly channel (and maybe you need to have set an about:config pref too, I forgot, search about it). I install the beta release of uBlock Origin from its GitHub releases page. EDIT:
113.
by ronjouch 6y ago
It's not exactly "an entry for each website", but yes it's based on a list: https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/abp/
114.
by ronjouch 6y ago
Or, if you already use uBlock Origin and would rather use its performant, customizable, extensible filtering capabilities instead of adding (and trusting!) yet another addon, just check the "EasyList Cookie" list in your Filter Li
115.
by ronjouch 6y ago
Brace yourself: major UI revamp coming around Firefox 89, https://google.com/search?q=firefox%20proton
116.
by ronjouch 6y ago
Why, and which third-party resources are you referring to? Looking at uBlock Origin in a GitHub PR page now, I see the following domains: - github.com - githubusercontent.com, DNS pointing at github.map.fastly.net - githubapp.com - githubas
117.
by ronjouch 6y ago
I'd love this in Firefox! Does anyone know if it's already planned? If not, I'll create a bugzilla bug for it later today.
118.
Neat VS Code 1.52 troubleshooting feature: Extension bisect(code.visualstudio.com)
1 points by ronjouch 6y ago|1 comments
119.
by ronjouch 6y ago
Spotify isn't an Electron app. It predates Electron and uses CEF ( https://bitbucket.org/chromiumembedded/cef , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_Embedded_Framework ), like Steam.
120.
by ronjouch 6y ago
Thanks for the clarification! On "Newer APIs like Vulkan strip away even more abstractions", another comment links to multi-part article https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop&#x2F

More ›