rognjen

21 ms·

271.
by rognjen 5y ago
Very easy answer: money. All the changes that seem hostile are in sole way supporting the bottom line in one way or another. In the example of Blizzard, and WoW in particular, my (probably oversimplified and/or naive) guess is that the
272.
The Container Throttling Problem(danluu.com)
255 points by rognjen 5y ago|87 comments
273.
by rognjen 5y ago
Same article on Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/?p=1822047
274.
by rognjen 5y ago
That's exactly the point because it's a template. I'll likely have value from it once so I'd expect to pay for it once, especially since I'd be allowed to use it on one site. The fact that they continue to improve i
275.
by rognjen 5y ago
I don't disagree with the amount, that largely depends on how useful you find the features. I disagree with the subscription part.
276.
by rognjen 5y ago
I can see this list get more useful as the categories get more complete. I do question the design of the logo which makes the site look like an official EU initiative, which it is not. At best it's unintentionally misleading and at wor
277.
by rognjen 5y ago
I am very put off by the fact that the template is a yearly sub.
278.
The Container Throttling Problem(danluu.com)
13 points by rognjen 5y ago|0 comments
279.
RailsConf 2018: Conceptual Compression by David Heinemeier Hansson (2018)[video](youtube.com)
3 points by rognjen 5y ago|1 comments
280.
by rognjen 5y ago
If you mean updates to the schema then some sort of migration system surely exists for your framework of choice, such as in Rails and Laravel too I think. If you mean one-off changes to existing data what has served me well so far is implem
281.
by rognjen 5y ago
I wonder what this is about...
282.
Protected: December Post(pentestpartners.com)
1 points by rognjen 5y ago|2 comments
283.
I Can’t See You but I’m Not Blind(steveblank.com)
183 points by rognjen 5y ago|306 comments
284.
by rognjen 5y ago
In general, that's a good point. It's not as important as it used to be, you're right. But I'd definitely not discount it entirely simply because not everyone has access or can afford to pay for the music apps, particula
285.
by rognjen 5y ago
Other than a variety of technical reasons already mentioned, I think VEVO is an amazing moat that would be very difficult for even the most funded of competitors to cross.
286.
by rognjen 5y ago
I have a couple of folders in the bookmarks bar and I just Ctrl+Click them. There's always one for each project I'm working on, there's one for some admin stuff, and a side project or two.
287.
How to rest well(psyche.co)
326 points by rognjen 5y ago|113 comments
288.
by rognjen 5y ago
In Southeast Asia, bank transfers as payment are part of the norm. On our platform much more than half of all payments use bank transfers. For Malaysia specifically this is facilitated by a nation-wide provider in which all banks must parti
289.
Ruby String::negative(ognjen.io)
1 points by rognjen 5y ago|0 comments
290.
Your Brain Can Only Take So Much Focus(hbr.org)
38 points by rognjen 5y ago|11 comments
291.
Major Errors and Corrections(danluu.com)
47 points by rognjen 5y ago|1 comments
292.
by rognjen 5y ago
I find users' attachment to trivial details of services they use so fascinating. I honestly cannot recall a single instance of when I cared that something was changed that I loudly complained. I decided that either the service was acce
293.
Don't half-ass many things(themarketplace.guide)
1 points by rognjen 5y ago|0 comments
294.
Two Ways of Doing Design(themarketplace.guide)
2 points by rognjen 5y ago|0 comments
295.
by rognjen 5y ago
Oh that's because the URL is quite long including the URL of the Google logo and everything else that's shown on the page. So no server-side needed.
296.
by rognjen 5y ago
Not sure what you mean exactly. If you mean large proportional to the page in the example, it's because I resized the "certificate" so that a huge image isn't loaded. I didn't scale the QR code down so that the imag
297.
QR codes suck for document verification(ognjen.io)
2 points by rognjen 5y ago|4 comments
298.
by rognjen 5y ago
I would guess because it was quite wrong and some people just read the article and not the comments. If it had stayed on the front page, there would have been lots of people who read it and just assumed it was true because it's on the
299.
by rognjen 5y ago
Just FYI that post is wildly inaccurate and the submission has been flagged: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29103056
300.
Creating Ethical Product Principles(mindtheproduct.com)
2 points by rognjen 5y ago|0 comments

More ›