roflyear

29 ms·

391.
by roflyear 3y ago
I've never gotten anything out of discipline itself.
392.
by roflyear 3y ago
You don't use calc much when you use R, unless you're working on a problem that involves calculus, which isn't many problems, usually? R is usually used to do data stuffs in my experience. Like, "take in this data from
393.
by roflyear 3y ago
I use ChatGPT occasionally to produce complicated queries, or to do some complicated stuff on nested data structures (if I don't care to give them example data).
394.
by roflyear 3y ago
Sure, I understand. I have experience with other venture, private equity, and other hedge funds. None of them have been great investments, for what it is worth! Not much protection (though some) during the last few downturns, either. Even o
395.
by roflyear 3y ago
Interesting. The fund doesn't seem to be doing too great. Anthropic is an interesting company. The salary band there is really high. Engineers starting at $300k
396.
by roflyear 3y ago
How did you invest in them?
397.
by roflyear 3y ago
It's obviously not something they can say in press releases, but it also may not be factual (or provable). There are "we think" situations which are important.
398.
by roflyear 3y ago
Would you mind pointing out how this is a "feminist" translation?
399.
by roflyear 3y ago
Who are you to judge what is serious or not? The Odyssey has been translated dozens of times. Have you read most of them, to be able to substantiate these statements?
400.
by roflyear 3y ago
What does this have to do with anything?
401.
by roflyear 3y ago
Doubtful. Read some of the flagged comments here to find out why: fighting malaria will inevitably become a political issue in the US.
402.
by roflyear 3y ago
Not exactly, no.
403.
by roflyear 3y ago
I don't think so. For example, if there is info on twitter that puts a government employee at risk, I think it's appropriate for someone to point that out to twitter.
404.
by roflyear 3y ago
I don't think that gives them all the avenues to express things that may be important.
405.
by roflyear 3y ago
Not the context I was replying to.
406.
by roflyear 3y ago
Sure. "We think that info may put someone on our security team at risk, can you please take it down?"
407.
by roflyear 3y ago
Not what I meant at all. You're deciding to interpret things as bad faith.
408.
by roflyear 3y ago
Have you used SQLAlchemeny and PeeWee extensively? I have found these to be pretty fair when compared to Django. Anyway, you can use the Django ORM without Django :)
409.
by roflyear 3y ago
Use anything except Celery, is my vote. Even if that "anything" is something you roll yourself. Celery is mature, but has bitten me more than anything else. For scheduling, there are many libraries, but it's good to keep this
410.
by roflyear 3y ago
Python is a spec not an implementation, for what it is worth.
411.
by roflyear 3y ago
I am sure you are just as illogical as other people - and it would be good for you to realize that! Never did I say that I support governments. I was only asking what I thought (and was wrong about) was a positive provoking question.
412.
by roflyear 3y ago
Man, people are being really rude here just for me asking a question.
413.
by roflyear 3y ago
Which restrictions are you cool with?
414.
by roflyear 3y ago
I'm just saying there are times where you may want the government to be able to express opinions....
415.
by roflyear 3y ago
That's implying compelling speech which is not the discussion.
416.
by roflyear 3y ago
You can't think of a scenario where the government should be able to express a thought about something? ;)
417.
by roflyear 3y ago
It's an interesting discussion: should the government be able to ask private entities to take down content? What if that content puts a family at risk? What if the WH thinks it does, but it isn't obvious to a third party?
418.
by roflyear 3y ago
Going to be great to have to get a neural implant to get a job.
419.
by roflyear 3y ago
Do you own a home?
420.
by roflyear 3y ago
Do you think we should increase housing supply?

More ›