rmbyrro

37 ms·

601.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Yes, the CCP published on their website that Apple is collaborating with them. Of course there wouldn't be any evidence. What people allege is that Apple being successful in China is suspicious.
602.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Given the history of China and its tech companies, the burden of proof shifted to their shoulders. So, I turn to them: is there anything that proves its a surveillance-free device? No, they cannot assure that. Someone may not like it, but C
603.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
MBA asteroids are well motivated on their own. No need for asteroid cohesion to complain on HN
604.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
The username is "telegpt"
605.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
That sounds like a Musk job
606.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Expect MBAs to show up here condemning the derogatory use of MBA
607.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I guess that's not how corporate liquidation work. A liquidator will evaluate the assets current market value and try to liquidate them in the most advantageous way for creditors. Which means: they'll try to get at least the valua
608.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Hiring to produce more demos, to hire more to produce even more demos...
609.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
That's fair enough for you to think like that. I see something totally different. I frequently discover new things that help me and make some part of my life better, easier, anything positive. And I see many people around me experienci
610.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I see nobody here suggesting you to be like this guy. None of the suggestions here were remotely similar to doing that. It seems to me your conflating things and assuming that anything you don't do is being like this guy. There are pro
611.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Did this realistic view provide you with any good results or advances in the aspects you aspire for your life? If you can objectively convince yourself that yes, with real examples, that's great for you. If not, maybe this realistic vi
612.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
As someone coming from a low class family, living in an underdeveloped country, I concentrate my attention on what's positive. Imagining a glass ceiling will only undermine my efforts and confidence. If you look around, I am absolutely
613.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Unbelievable how someone can have such a distorted view
614.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
You're certainly right. But in this case, no LTS would have covered, since the system was decades old. The issue was that they had a poorly maintained service, hugely outdated, which is hard to secure, mingled with their main up-to-dat
615.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I understand it'd be necessary to implement all auth and check rules in SQL queries using roles and the CHECK statement. What's the alternative in cases where I need more advanced checking before doing an INSERT/UPDATE that i
616.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I thought it would be pretty obvious that one should look for biographical data from external, independent sources. If the person has earned a reputation in any industry, they'll probably have articles on respectable publishers, would
617.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I hear chess.com is better at combating cheaters. Hard to prove / disprove the claim. Anyways, I guess this is one reason for some people. Sponsoring players and influencers certainly helps cementing their brand.
618.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Really? You buy books without searching anything about who wrote it? If yes, well, there's the problem then. It's not AI, but the lack of guidance and research skills in support of the process of choosing a book.
619.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I didn't claim the official docs have no mistakes. Since there's only one documentation, beginners can't get wrong with which docs to use. Ad opposed to books, which have tons of bad choices available (hence the current discu
620.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Book buyers should give themselves primarily by who's the author, I think. Choose a book from someone that has a hard earned reputation to protect.
621.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I guess book authors don't like my perspective...
622.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Why don't beginners start at Python.org, though? It's such a great resource to learn the language. - it's free, unlike books - always up-to-date, unlike even the best book after a few months - easy to choose: heck, there&#x27
623.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Can't the deluge be delusional or an overreaction at best?
624.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
You first check who published it. Is the author an expert in the matter with years, perhaps decades in the industry? Heck, we always did that since before GPT. Good authors will continue to publish good content because they have a reputatio
625.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I totally agree. So why are people so worried about books being written by ChatGPT? These pseudo-authors will get bad reviews, will lose money in refunds, burn their names. It's not sustainable. Some will try, for sure, but they won&#x
626.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
100% agreed. I've seen many developers using technologies without reading the official documentation. It's insane. They make mistakes and always blame the tech. It's ludicrous...
627.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Personally I don't subscribe to the "best practices" expression. It implies an absolute best choice, which, in my experience, is rarely sensible in tech. There are almost always trade-offs and choosing one option usually invo
628.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
They can indeed distinguish them, I agree. So why the fuss? I think the concern is that bad authors would game the reviews and lure audiences into bad books. But aren't they already able to do so? Is it sustainable long term? If you sp
629.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Another great contribution would be fine-tuning open source LLMs on less popular tech. I've seen ChatGPT struggling with htmx, for example (I presume the training dataset was small?), whereas it performs really well teaching React (hug
630.
by rmbyrro 3y ago
Aren't there already bad Python books written by humans? I bet ChatGPT can come up with above-average content to teach Python. We should teach beginners how to prompt engineer in the context of tech learning. I bet it's going to y

More ›