4 ms·
I hear chess.com is better at combating cheaters. Hard to prove / disprove the claim. Anyways, I guess this is one reason for some people. Sponsoring players a
by rmbyrro 3y ago
I hear chess.com is better at combating cheaters. Hard to prove / disprove the claim. Anyways, I guess this is one reason for some people.
Sponsoring players and influencers certainly helps cementing their brand.
- 317070 3y ago> I hear chess.com is better at combating cheaters. That contradicts what I have been hearing. And it makes total sense. Unlike on lichess, the incentives are wrong for chess.com to remove whale cheaters.
- not1ofU 3y agoposted 5 days ago - chess podcast with: Fabiano Caruana and Cristian Chirila Special guest - Vladimir Kramnik, who has being researching cheating in chess with stats, quite intersting / disturbing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ng3lTBAi4Ps https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ng3lTBAi4Ps
- rectang 3y agoRelated,because it’s another human problem: lichess is way better than other free options I used to play (freechess.org, yahoo chess) at keeping comments under control.