Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rjtavares
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
61.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
Looks like you got it. Have fun!
62.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
Yeah. I think each user gets onr invite per week. Here's an invite code: bsky-social-ejzzv-3pehr
63.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
Bluesky is having some degraded performance due to "record-high traffic" (according to them). As a casual user, it's noticeable how many people are posting now.
64.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
I highly recommend the interview with the author on The Gradient podcast. A wonderful conversation on language, culture, and LLMs: https://thegradientpub.substack.com/p/ted-underwood-machine-...
65.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
With embeddings you can compute distance. The questions don't have to be the same, they just have to be sufficiently close. Regarding context, that should be a part of the input for the embeddings.
66.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
It is, because saying "executive branch can simply borrow money whenever it sees fit" makes it seem like the executive has unlimited power to spend.
67.
▲
by
rjtavares
3y ago
Most other countries allow the executive branch to simply borrow money, not whenever it sees fit, but when it is required to execute the budget approved by the legislative branch. That is an important distinction.
68.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Not GP, but my native language doesn't have an "it" pronoun, just he/she, so my use of "it" is always inconsistent. May be the same situation.
69.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
No. It could have prevented some banks from owning them directly, and that could have cointained their growth, but we don't know really. Crisis would happened anyway for sure, but the scale could have been smaller. But it's hard t
70.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
We don't know. Glass Steagall Act doesn't really deal with the fundamental problem with 2008, which was at its core an error in measuring potential risk of new finantial products. It could have prevented some of the worst impacts
71.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Labelling data is easier, I think. It will just take a while...
72.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
There isn't an obvious unsupervised problem to train medical imaging with. What's the medical imaging equivalent to "predict the next word"?
73.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Honestly, how many serious use cases require sensitive contexts? Most enterprise uses will require guard rails, and that's where they'll make most money. OfficeGPT will be huge in the corporate world.
74.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
It's not a pyramid scheme. A pyramid scheme can only continue it people keep putting money into it. SVB didn't need more money coming in, they just couldn't handle money coming out.
75.
▲
Hugging Face and AWS partner to make AI more accessible
(huggingface.co)
102 points
by
rjtavares
4y ago
|
41 comments
76.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Now imagine the government having the power to do that on every vacant property. Not just state-owned: all private-owned but vacant properties could be forcefully rented.
77.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
I'm fine with additional taxing of those houses, but having the state take over the renovation and renting processes is a recipe for corruption (which, given Portugal's recent history, makes me think it's actually the real pu
78.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
I heard a few hours ago António Costa talking about it on RTP (state television), and it's in this document: https://s3.observador.pt/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16165400... (as ARRENDAMENTO OBRIGATÓ
79.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Thank you for the awesome work you do making sure this site stays great!
80.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Well, the party in government has a majority in parliament, so they can just approve by themselves (and there is no history of members of the ruling party voting against any government measure).
81.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
The measures announced are far more ambitious than this article suggests. The one that will cause the most controversy is the State taking over unused housing, making improvements if needed, and then renting the properties (with the money g
82.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
The obvious answer is Fast AI's Practical Deep Learning for Coders - https://course.fast.ai/ They'll also be releasing the "From Deep Learning Foundations to Stable Diffusion" course soon, which is basic
83.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
I'm not being condescending at all, we've learned that the value in AI is in the applications. If you think government should regulate the field, it should be to make AI Models a commodity, like electricity.
84.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Small players should focus on applications of this tech. We now know that whatever AI Models succeed in the future, they'll be trained by a huge company and finetuned to a specific use case. Small companies should be working on use cas
85.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Definitely Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast, which just wrapped up. I recommend you start with the French Revolution (season 3). Another favorite of mine is "Fall of Civilizations". It takes the almost-audiobook approach of
86.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
It's not the typical HR pattern, but there are some genuine oblivious people that amuse me greatly. Like you said, the best ones are masters of poker face: polite and toned-down.
87.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
As someone working in HR for the last few years, this is the most correct take. I would add that people working in HR - like any other area - have their own goals, and you should also take that in consideration. Sometimes they don't al
88.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
The "Tides of History" podcast recently finished a whole season (100+ episodes) about Prehistory and the Bronze Age that goes deep into these types of genetic studies. Fascinating stuff, definitely recommended. One highlight for m
89.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
I can understand that, but the solution can never be privatize the police - that is just giving up and formalizing the unfairness.
90.
▲
by
rjtavares
4y ago
Equality before the law is a basic principle of Democracy. A privatized police will not, by design, apply the law equally to all people. That's unacceptable.
More ›