Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rickdeaconx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Large Blast Radius Coder Registry Hijack
(optimuslabs.io)
1 points
by
rickdeaconx
28d ago
|
1 comments
2.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
28d ago
"An attacker hijacked Coder's own delivery infrastructure to serve credential-stealing modules from a trusted domain." Tooling/supply chain attacks are likely our biggest enemy at this point.
3.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
6mo ago
The idea of getting information from other engineers relies on the idea that the other engineers aren't already complacent with AI.
4.
▲
Interlock/Apozy (YC W17) Is Hiring
(interlock.breezy.hr)
1 points
by
rickdeaconx
5y ago
5.
▲
The Most Clever(Ridiculous) Cold Outreach Effort
(medium.com)
2 points
by
rickdeaconx
9y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
Chromebook Security 101
(medium.com)
2 points
by
rickdeaconx
9y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
9y ago
This is so painfully accurate.
8.
▲
How Hackers Evade Malware and Phishing Blacklists
(medium.com)
2 points
by
rickdeaconx
9y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
We rely on the whitelist to block all new threats, putting us ahead of domain-based blacklists. The server side checking is just to create a grade for privacy which you can look at for informational purposes as you browse.
10.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
We keep just the FQDN for sites that you "unlock". If you don't click unlock, nothing is stored.
11.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
We don't need to send any information to our service to protect you from bad sites because that is handled locally. The browser history already exists so the load on your machine is the same with or without Apozy. We use the headers to
12.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
Safari will definitely be up soon. The reason why we're better at that than an AdBlock is because we use a whitelist approach. When using a whitelist, all the newest sites and attacks are blocked by default. AdBlock will always be slig
13.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
There is no data collection by default. Everything is opt-in. The only information we communicate is what you opt into. The browser history stays in your browser and is not sent to Apozy. If you're opted into privacy scoring it sends o
14.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
MS definitely has a hold of the market but it's changing pretty rapidly. We have big plans!
15.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
Thanks! We're working on device support across the board, improved privacy scoring, and toying with the idea of adding Google's Perspective - https://www.perspectiveapi.com .
16.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
Site comparison is done natively using Chrome's history APIs. As far as representations for each site, we don't need to scan the DOM because our extension relies on native sandboxing via CSP headers.
17.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
Community features allow us to improve the product across the board and we would take that into account. :)
18.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
Sorry! It will be for FF on Android.
19.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
Browsing habits are analyzed locally. We only collect data if privacy grades or community protection is enabled via opting in. For those features we only collect the bare minimum to conduct analysis and the dataset is anonymous.
20.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
We'll be launching a mobile version for FF + Android soon. We agree, mobile is a place where this can also help immensely.
21.
▲
Launch HN: Apozy (YC W17) – Use browsing habits to stop phishing and spot breaches
61 points
by
rickdeaconx
10y ago
|
32 comments
22.
▲
by
rickdeaconx
14y ago
Security is an afterthought; startups need to be considering it as a basis.