richbell

14 ms·

121.
by richbell 2y ago
> “tweeting to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “Stop hitting on me”;” LMAO no way this is a real lawsuit Where is this quote from? I may be blind, but I don't see it in the article or linked document.
122.
by richbell 2y ago
Related: https://youtu.be/-gGLvg0n-uY
123.
by richbell 2y ago
Or having a medical emergency and being rushed to a hospital that happens to be out of network.
124.
by richbell 2y ago
"NPC" and "bot" used to have different meanings. It'd be interesting if the terms converged. I believe that "bot" gained popularity around 2012, specifically in reference to influence campaigns on Twitter.
125.
by richbell 2y ago
https://hackerone.com/github $600 for a low seems pretty good to me.
126.
by richbell 2y ago
https://threads.com/
127.
by richbell 2y ago
So you don't think that landlords should be regulated because the solution is more supply, but also think that landlords should be allowed to intentionally restrict supply?
128.
by richbell 2y ago
> If that is the case half of the superstonks subreddit would have to be charged. You could make a compelling argument that they should be. Superstonks doesn't just post their positions. They, too, try to manipulate the market by
129.
by richbell 2y ago
> So to fix the problem isn't to regulate landlords (aka, attempting to legislate price controls), but to produce more supply. It's both. Producing more supply works best when it isn't being sabotaged by landlords intentio
130.
by richbell 2y ago
> The whining starts instantly when someone makes a bit dough Can you elucidate what your comment is trying to say in the context of the article? I don't understand the relevance.
131.
by richbell 2y ago
See also: "This Is Financial Advice" by Dan Olson https://youtu.be/5pYeoZaoWrA
132.
by richbell 2y ago
My understanding is that replay attacks are possible with a TPM, if the consuming logic is flawed. IIRC Microsoft's original implementation of signing Primary Refresh Tokens with TPM was flawed in this way.
133.
by richbell 2y ago
> This should be an industry standard for other games as well! It's only a matter of time before single player games require always-online kernel-level DRM.
134.
by richbell 2y ago
The answer is apparently that the code I linked isn't released yet. The latest available release only checks if target is nil.
135.
by richbell 2y ago
Actually, the `err == nil` check doesn't exist in the latest release. It was added recently, which would explain the significant performance cost. If err is nil, it doesn't return early. https://github.com/golang&#
136.
by richbell 2y ago
The `err == nil` check was added in April to avoid expensive and unnecessary reflection. Perhaps 1.23, or whichever release that ends up in, would be faster? https://github.com/golang/go/commit/af43932c20d5b5
137.
by richbell 2y ago
> errors.Is() is expensive. If you use it, check the error is non-nil first to avoid a pretty big performance penalty on the happy path. Am I missing something, or could this be partially mitigated by adding a check for `err == nil &
138.
by richbell 2y ago
> I haven't heard of Hudson Rock before, does anyone know if they are a reputable source? I first learned of Hudson Rock after their "CEO" started spamming every security-related subreddit with low-effort blogspam over a p
139.
by richbell 2y ago
Depending on the circumstances, it could be construed as constructive dismissal. Creating unfavorable ultimatums allows companies to 'lay off' people without having to pay severance. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki
140.
by richbell 2y ago
Something can be a widespread issue without affecting you personally.
141.
by richbell 2y ago
> At the time, dependency management solutions were pretty primitive to what we have today... What has fundamentally changed since then, in your opinion?
142.
by richbell 2y ago
This submission was posted first. You can tell by the id.
143.
by richbell 2y ago
A doppelgänger refers to a real person that happens to share your likeness.
144.
by richbell 2y ago
Within reason, sure. I don't think the demands being made are reasonable. Google is already doing their part to stop it from spreading, but they aren't the source. Compare that to something like malicious ads, which Google has ful
145.
by richbell 2y ago
> The search engine provides a path for victims to report that content whenever it appears in search results. And when processing these requests, Google also removes duplicates of any flagged deepfakes. > Google's spokesperson to
146.
by richbell 2y ago
> There is absolutely no reason to require your pilots to require a MAX simulator to begin flying the MAX. Once the engines are started, there is only one difference between NG and MAX procedurally, and that is that there is no OFF posit
147.
by richbell 2y ago
This feels like a submarine article for Couchbase. https://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
148.
by richbell 2y ago
I mean, it doesn't really contribute anything to the subject being discussed.
149.
by richbell 2y ago
> ...many of the main concerns could have been dispelled by Tiktok getting a source code and security audit... Source code isn't static. For the sake of argument, a malicious actor could easily submit "clean" source code f
150.
by richbell 2y ago
Back in my day, this was called "blog spam."

More ›