rhn_mk1

13 ms·

121.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
"Compose o o" "C" °C
122.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Check out what I wrote two posts above. If them suing you is a problem then you have trouble in your legal system regardless of copyright.
123.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
This makes sense, but "prioritize not eating what you don't want" is, in a subtle but important way, a different piece of advice than "prioritize eating what you want". The first leads to moderation, the other to gl
124.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
If I'm misrepresenting your point about following desires first and foremost, then please explain. You say "follow advice tailored to your specific situation", but you don't need to be a doctor or to know the specific si
125.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Beware of simple answers. Don't thoughtlessly follow your desires. Don't ignore others, but learn from them.
126.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
If you want crystal meth, take crystal meth. Oh wait, maybe always doing what you want isn't actually that good of an idea.
127.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
On the other hand, you can take some (closed?) code a company wrote, feed it into AI, and launder it for your purpose. While this is not a symmetric exchange, it does reduce the power of copyright for everyone.
128.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I agree with you when you talk about places where companies can bully people just by threatening to sue them, and where the defender must have lots of money even if they are clearly in the right. But AI does not change anything there. The p
129.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
The barrier to running an AI model is getting lower every day, so the threshold for ignoring copyright is getting lower with it.
130.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Those facts are not as easily verifiable as you might think. "Some academic articles about exit polls and vote tallies in swing districts" does not bring any relevant on the search engine I tried. Your claims are extraordinary, so
131.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I'm skeptical of AI intentionally being made sentient, given how badly in the dark we are. But this being in the dark also makes it hard to rule out AI accidentally becoming sentient.
132.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
"Legitimate interest" is not a common expression, but a term of law related to data processing and defined under GDPR: > “[where] processing is necessary for the purpose of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or
133.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I think the "constant" is throwing off the message here. I think the parent is trying to summarize all the unreliable, occasional, and probablilistic factors that models ignore (because they are hard to model), but which still inf
134.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
The acronym does not make sense outside of English.
135.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Then you're confusing what the dscussion is about. All "lines" "in reality" have thickness and none are infinite. "Orbits" "in reality" are not conical sections. But they are not very useful to t
136.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
As long as we don't have a Perfect, True, Unified theory of gravity, I don't think you get to say that "in reality" is self-explanatory. It can reasonably mean Newtonian dynamics or relativity, or I don't know what
137.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
You have to start thinking about it now: don't buy things to which you don't have open access. Lobby the politicians to make this happen if you care. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/
138.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Okay. Taking the 20min saved per ride from the article, and 300 rides that would otherwise take the longer route per day out of my ass, we get 100 hours saved per day. That's approximately 4 days saved per day. From https://
139.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Doing bad "science" is not illegal, but maybe should be, considering the replication crisis that is upon us. It diminishes the utility of the work that is being done, and makes it difficult to tell apart actual scientific discover
140.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
There's an IETF draft for SSH over QUIC, but I'm not sure if this is an implementation of it, or an own thing: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bider-ssh-quic-09.html
141.
Quicssh: SSH over QUIC(github.com)
182 points by rhn_mk1 3y ago|61 comments
142.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
From the article: The introduction of the new spectrum has relieved the pressure on overloaded cell sites, and we’ve seen cellular speeds rise significantly.
143.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Let me spell out what short term phenomenon I'm addressing: "the short-term policy goal was something other than safety"
144.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Estimates are by definition most certainly wrong. And despite that, you think your high estimates are better than my low estimates. By your own logic, you're wrong and lacking an argument. Claiming that coal is better than nuclear is w
145.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
That's right, plants which don't run don't produce emissions. But they don't produce energy either. But read the article and look at 2020-2022: coal energy generation increased while nuclear decreased: https:/&#x
146.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I'm not estimating anything, I'm asking you to provide the proof of coal's superiority over nuclear. If the numbers are so clear in favor of coal's guaranteed damage against nuclear's risks, you should have no probl
147.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I agree that it's not only the death count, but what do you do with contamination caused by fossil fuels? The radioactive isotopes released by burning coal are released gradually and everywhere, not concentrated into a certain region.
148.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Operating at less than peak capacity doesn't make burning coal any more healthy, and doesn't make the decision to not retire them any more safety-oriented.
149.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
How would you convince me to take a guaranteed small cut to my life quality compared to taking a very low chance of earlier death? In the end, the high impact risks of nuclear are of extremely low probability, and they compound better than
150.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
There is a distinct increase of coal-burning plants in the article a couple years ago, suggesting that they are partially a replacement. But what I actually want to highlight is that every nuclear plant closed instead of a closed coal plant

More ›