4 ms·
Those facts are not as easily verifiable as you might think. "Some academic articles about exit polls and vote tallies in swing districts" does not bring any re
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Those facts are not as easily verifiable as you might think. "Some academic articles about exit polls and vote tallies in swing districts" does not bring any relevant on the search engine I tried.
Your claims are extraordinary, so could you duly provide the extraordinary evidence?
- mandmandam 3y agoAre they really such extraordinary claims? Witness: the 2000 election. The voting machines that were hackable with a screwdriver and USB. The fact that even now, many states lack any paper trail. The termination of exit polls after double digit discrepancies in 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_voting_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_voting_in_the_Unite... has many sources and stories for you to have a look at. It's ... Extraordinary. While election shenanigans may not be as clearly, obviously bad as the flagged (!) GP claims, they are far from what I would call a basic minimum standard.
- hedora 3y agoHuh, Google Scholar is significantly crappier than I remember (at least for this topic) Here’s one from 2004: https://ia903008.us.archive.org/9/items/files-all/rnc-election-plans/exit-polls-2004-edison-mitofsky.pdf https://ia903008.us.archive.org/9/items/files-all/rnc-electi... Search terms (ddg): academic study of exit poll discrepancies 2004