4 ms·
That's right, plants which don't run don't produce emissions. But they don't produce energy either. But read the article and look at 2020-2022: coal energy gen
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
That's right, plants which don't run don't produce emissions. But they don't produce energy either.
But read the article and look at 2020-2022: coal energy generation increased while nuclear decreased:
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb96cf5f0-dd6f-457e-bc79-2a1b9732dd0f_2450x1724.png https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_...
This is a situation incompatible with a policy of increasing safety. Increasing safety means shutting down unsafe sources while keeping or rolling out safe sources, which is the opposite of the short-term trend. So the short-term policy goal was something other than safety.
- bayesian_horse 3y agoYou can't prove a long term trend via short term observation. That's kindergarden level...
- rhn_mk1 3y agoLet me spell out what short term phenomenon I'm addressing: "the short-term policy goal was something other than safety"