Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rhizome
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
The first-sale doctrine says the ticket industry could not , in fact, stop reselling. That said, your plan is one ticket per identified person, that you can't buy 4 tickets at a time for you and your friends? Not sure that'll fly
32.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
Bulk generating credit card numbers that can be charged a reservation fee?
33.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
It means Peter Thiel's smile looks fake.
34.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
"WEI" isn't used on the page.
35.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
Doesn't matter. POSIX is "write once, compile everywhere," while this is "compile once, run everywhere." It could be that POSIX is easier to write than for Cosmo bins, shifting the balance between them! I see them a
36.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
> Leaving AI to a handful of companies is in my opinion the fastest route for inequality and power concentration/centralisation It's a homesteading land grab, plain, simple and pure. There is a competitive landscape, first-mov
37.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
I think the extremely most important aspect of AI security is for there to be a right to deinfluence . There has to be way to rescind my contributions, whether they're voluntary or not (I still think these companies are dancing with c
38.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
The fish rots from the head, blame MBAs and Stanford GSB in particular. Google e.g. "Peter Thiel laughing" and click on Images to view a panoply of boundaries in executive humanity.
39.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
Cost of technology doesn't matter for this. It's not the hammers, it's the building permits.
40.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
It doesn't have to be personal to be condescending and/or dismissive.
41.
▲
by
rhizome
3y ago
POSIX was never about binary portability.
42.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
IANAL, but from my understanding of the points at issue, I think a court might be likely to find that a) sucking the image into RAM is a copy in the first place; b) the FFT/etc. would be a (first) derivative work; c) using a form of th
43.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Flame-bait gets good traffic, can't let that engagement go to waste!
44.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
The word "discussing" is doing a lot of work there and does nothing to distinguish it from condescension. Knowing something is one thing, being nice about it is quite another. Opposing them with a "but," like "hey t
45.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
The "idea" at issue isn't like "a picture of a tree," though. It's "a picture of a tree as conceived by Ansel Adams and photographed with [technical details]."
46.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
But "you" (or I) don't describe the photo, their process does, and I'm not confident that Separation of Concerns would be enough to establish a clean room.
47.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
That tagline certainly seems like it's gonna make their "preponderance of evidence" an uphill battle!
48.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
The 8-tracks make me think it's a flea market setup.
49.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Like Tesla FSD, it's a knob for the company's share price. All VC-adjacent moonshots are. They're the encroachment of symbolism into capitalist systems of value.
50.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
I think a case could be made that ML is automated growth hacking.
51.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Is identity theft really their problem to solve?
52.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Look into reverse SSH tunnelling. SSH from primary to secondary, which then connects back to the primary through the already-established SSH connection.
53.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
And for which FB is currently fighting a class action lawsuit: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1532210053469687808.html
54.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Hardware-heavy companies (e.g. a lot of the new space companies) need the level of investment that you can only really get from public markets, but are still quite small companies from the perspective of people here. For example, they migh
55.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
That would explain the opposite situation when it comes to tax avoidance schemes.
56.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Wonder how it works in Wine.
57.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Laffer Curve, really? The inefficiency is neither proof nor justification, it's a side-effect of fairness.
58.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Sure yeah, but to be sure, inefficiency is a side effect of the complexity.
59.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if Larry got them CIA/gov't contracts to avoid anything like that happening.
60.
▲
by
rhizome
4y ago
Acquisitions always ruin the thing being acquired.
More ›