rfd4sgmk8u

11 ms·

1.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
The fact that you can't see such measures as being draconian is kinda the point of this thread. The way that the heavy handed nature of the Australian government approach seems normalized to your average Australian is precisely the nor
2.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
You won't see it until you leave that place. The firebombing of Shanks-Markovina should be a wake up call about the power of deeply entrenched corrupt and anti-democratic bodies. The existence of the private criminal investigation into
3.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
This looks like an open source implementation of "Cheating at poker James Bond Style - Defcon 24 (2016)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRgCvCTG_XQ Very neat. In the video, the illicit cheating device was hidden
4.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
You do not understand my position at all. I am denying nothing to anyone. Everyone has the autonomy to choose their own moral and political views, including those which I do not personally approve. What is not granted is the ability to forc
5.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I don't hate anyone. I think they are self-defeating and delusional, but I don't hate. Hate is wanting everyone else in the world to believe your delusions, and using the full force of the State to ensure compliance. There is only
6.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Fighting against other people seeking medical procedures is a hateful position. Yes, if you are opposed to another person doing something with their body, you are filled with hate. Basically you are asking for a tyranny of a majority. It ju
7.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
No. Fuck that. There is not 'two viewpoints'. There is: * Oppress women * Don't oppress women This is the paradox of tolerance. You cannot negotiate with a monster who wants to force their views on people, especially those ar
8.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
No, I dont hate them, in fact she is completely within her rights to determine what happens to her own body. What she does not have is the right to say what another woman does with her body. However, if she believes that she can force anoth
9.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I get it, you hate women and want to punish them for having sex with you. Please reflect on your position. Your position is horrendously misogynistic, and if you do not understand why, you should talk to some women. Probably don't lead
10.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
It would have been nicer to codify the rights before pulling the rug on it.
11.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Yes. Yes. Yes. No. anything else is none of your business.
12.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I stand by that there is no position that is acceptable to anyone accept their own body. You don't get to decide what other people do. Yes I do think they hate themselves, or at least hate their sex, their world or their (nonexistent)
13.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I wasn't aware that having a baby was a crime, but yet, failing to birth it appears to be now. nb: Women have gone to jail for miscarriages as a result of such women-hating laws. My thoughts on the prison system are not relevant to sup
14.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
The earlier part is: "Boy, I've never seen an issue so divisive. You ever see it, it's like a civil war, isn't it? Even amongst my friends, who are all very intelligent! They are totally divided on abortion! It's un
15.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Ok good :-) I think my issue is the your idea of eviction, its not eviction, in the same way we don't 'evict' cancer, we 'treat' it. I think its best to leave it at 'no moral difference between abandoning life
16.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Buck vs Bell is a fucking travesty. You consider it acceptable that the State can sterilize 'feeble minds' because an old man in 1927 said it was cool? How about the realization that the law is an ass, and we need to stand up for
17.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
"We're pro-life." It's like, well what does that make me? You know what I mean? You're so pro-life! You're so pro-life, do me a fucking favor. Don't block med clinics, okay? Lock arms, and block cemeteries
18.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Its true. The only lack of empathy is by those that wish to tell a women what they can do with their body because they hate women. Its really simple. Want an abortion? Cool. Don't want an abortion? Cool. Anything else is none of your b
19.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
The only person it is tricky for is the mother, who is the only person in the universe whos opinion matters on abortion, and we must abide by the decisions of the individual. Anything else is absolute horror of biological control and loss o
20.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Its mean 'crypto phones', or custom firmware mobile phones with their own voice, chat and messaging system. The most recent busted operation, Anom, was actually run by Law Enforcement who backdoored the devices and recorded all th
21.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I read it in high school and would agree, it got me really excited about cryptography and espionage throughout history, no undoubtedly helped me discover infosec and cryptography. I saw Simon Singh present an another launch later, very insp
22.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
You are probably not going to get any sympathy for your hard line attitude here, this is hacker news, not daily stormer. You might want to grow some compassion too. The tech industry was built and maintained by immigrants, and all families
23.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I was a vegan for 10 years, now I only eat meat. I bought into the sustainability argument for a long time. I will not return to a plant based food diet -- and many people will agree with me, often quite aggressively. Eating beef is so impo
24.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
The connection parameters including encryption parameters and certificate from the origin. There are a lot of weird rules in WebPKI you may miss, this is beyond a general purpose TLS library. Enforcing Certificate Transparency rules or CAA
25.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I use mitm proxies for my research, and very much understand their purpose. what I am objecting to is using it as a general purpose privacy policy network filter. That is not what a MiTM proxy should be used for. The mitm proxy can inject j
26.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
I discount this approach. It is necessary but not sufficient to pass on simple browser SSL tests. There are other complexities that are best left to the browser to negotiate the session.
27.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Subverting browser trust by installing a mitm root is not a good way to implement network policy. Many have tried to do this, such as AV vendors, and it generally ends badly. Do I trust your TLS and certificate trust implementation over a m
28.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Thanks for the brain damage, Thomas Midgeley Jr!
29.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
decrypt, no, however it has visibility of the entire memory and so can read from pages backing the VM containing pre-encryption and post-decrypted content. Presumably that means that it could detect known strings in raw memory from a known
30.
by rfd4sgmk8u 4y ago
Negative incentive to discourage windows use, reducing cost for the vendor who now does not have to support proprietary drivers. Many vendors have realized that standard components lead to almost complete support in desktop Linuxes today. U

More ›