revelio

9 ms·

31.
by revelio 3y ago
I'm gonna assume "Android" here is a word meaning a centrally developed and somewhat more planned OS platform, not literally Android itself. The main reason there's no such OS is because developers by and large will not
32.
by revelio 3y ago
Sandstorm was an attempt to do this, but there isn't much demand. Why install WordPress when wordpress.com will run it for you as a service?
33.
by revelio 3y ago
People can complain about old jobs, sure. But not if they explicitly make a promise not to do so, especially not if they get paid in return for that promise. Whether governments will let her get away with it or not, it's a backstab to
34.
by revelio 3y ago
Within climatology people like Roy Spencer or Judith Curry. Outside, there's stuff like these papers I posted a couple of days ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36559554 Note the response - yes they may be nucl
35.
by revelio 3y ago
How is trust in the scientific community not belief? If you aren't checking their claims directly, then it's just that you believe them and others don't. BTW it's not really trust in the scientific community. There are l
36.
by revelio 3y ago
She's not technically right. Her article is filled with "all my bosses cheerfully agreed that the social media policy was impossible to comply with", which is nonsense. She could have just stopped using Twitter. She's no
37.
by revelio 3y ago
> some speech chills other speech Is this not just a way to say "my speech is free speech and protected, your speech is hate speech and should be banned"?
38.
by revelio 3y ago
Even worse than that. She took the $40k in return for agreeing to not disparage VMware. She then immediately started disparaging them, but it was "in private" whatever that means, so she presumed she wouldn't get caught. And
39.
by revelio 3y ago
Projection, your honor! We started with "probable billions" on climate-related PR and you replied with evidence of millions, much of which isn't on climate related stuff. Now you're saying what you meant wasn't bill
40.
by revelio 3y ago
I looked up the correct URL for the Watts report: https://heartland.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/2022_Surf... Well, I haven't yet seen you change any of your opinions, but obviously that isn't p
41.
by revelio 3y ago
Are you sure? That first graph is very oddly worded. It says investment in "energy transition" matched fossil fuel investment, not renewables, but that only half of "energy transition" investment was investment in supply
42.
by revelio 3y ago
It presumably ends in 2022 because that's the last full year and the data for 2023 would be incomplete and therefore not be comparable. That's expected, not some sort of sneaky trick. As for including the fracking boom, so what? I
43.
by revelio 3y ago
> to imply that hydrocarbons as a whole aren't successfully being replaced is deeply misleading. But natural gas is a hydrocarbon? Replacing coal with gas isn't a replacement of hydrocarbons.
44.
by revelio 3y ago
But I'm not asking you to find me credible. Why would I, this is an anonymous account, as is yours. If you can't reason about things except via who's saying them, then this really isn't the site for you. That's wh
45.
by revelio 3y ago
I'm trying my best to "argue in good faith", but if you want to change the topic or respond to different parts of an article than what's relevant to the topic it's really helpful to clarify that. I did figure it out
46.
by revelio 3y ago
Don't feel too bad about that one. I've seen Docker's default of non-persistent storage cause disaster even for professionals with years of experience. It's just a really bad bit of design.
47.
by revelio 3y ago
We're looking for a smoking gun because the original poster said there were "billions of dollars spent in an effort to increase public ignorance". For that claim to be true you'd need an entire battlefield of smoking gun
48.
by revelio 3y ago
Your posts are quite confusing, do you realize that? I started a reply asking if you had mixed up different locations in the thread, because it seemed like none of the stuff you were writing was connected with the topic or people being disc
49.
by revelio 3y ago
Sorry, it's easy to forget that many people have never encountered these facts before. Climatologists continuously rewrite history which is why it's so confusing. In 1999, NASA climatologist James Hansen was wondering why the USA
50.
by revelio 3y ago
OK here are the sources. Note that I said the spike was 60 seconds, not 1 second, not sure where you got a 1 second spike from. Re-reading the stories it seems it was more like a few minutes rather than one minute. Anyway, the RAF Coningsby
51.
by revelio 3y ago
1. That list contains items like "Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory", "Congress of Racial Equality", "Chemical Education Foundation", the "Independent Women’s Forum" and so on, in fact not one of
52.
by revelio 3y ago
The New Yorker article doesn't provide support for the claim of "probable billions of dollars" being spent on "increasing public ignorance", which is what I'm asking for. I didn't ask for examples of donat
53.
by revelio 3y ago
> I have a decent understanding of how science works in general. <consensus> That's not how science works, that's the opposite of how science works. This is the first reason we cannot get anywhere in this thread. Scienc
54.
by revelio 3y ago
From my original post: > A couple of decades ago this problem flared up in the US and Congress spent the money to build out a new state of the art weather station network > For nearly 20 years it's shown no warming in the USA wha
55.
by revelio 3y ago
Did you actually look at the data or just immediately Google for a rebuttal? The page you link to asserts there to be a trend, but then links back to the page I linked to, which: a. Doesn't plot trend lines. What are they trying to lin
56.
by revelio 3y ago
Well documented? This claim about extreme weather gets repeated and echoed by people who assume that it must be true because they keep hearing it, so they don't check. But it's not actually true. There's a summary paper here
57.
by revelio 3y ago
No it's just Twitter requiring a login now. None of the claims zackees is making are new or obscure. They're well known problems proven many years ago. For example so many thermometers are located next to runways because climatolo
58.
by revelio 3y ago
Last time someone made this claim about "probable billions of dollars" here, I asked for examples and the best anyone could show was a $10k donation to a tiny charity run by one guy that campaigned against offshore wind farms, wit
59.
by revelio 3y ago
Not exactly, no. Most newspapers are profitable. The mostly non-newspaper titles you list were all chasing the over-saturated market for liberal commentary and opinion. http://marcedge.com/jombs.pdf "This research f
60.
by revelio 3y ago
There are plenty of news websites with paywalls, it's common amongst conservative media. It's primarily the left wing media that thinks the government should tax tech firms instead of newspapers being required to charge customers.

More ›