Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
reso
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
They did not have control of the blast in the way that all other commercial launches do: with flame trenches, water deluge systems, etc. If the FAA knew that SpaceX could be throwing bus-sized pieces of concrete in the air that could potent
92.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
I loved watching the iterative development of the Starship upper stage, and it felt like they were doing it the right way. The full-stack superheavy feels like a different situation. Seeing how little control they have over the enormous bla
93.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
I went to a birthday party once for a guy who just got on 30 under 30. The facebook event (made by him) was called "Mr. 30 under 30's Birthday". The whole event was presented with deliberate irony, as if to say "Wouldn&#
94.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
Strange to read a flight transcript from before cockpit hygiene training. Transcripts of major incidents today sound like office meetings. These pilots sound emotional and disorganized comparatively.
95.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
Jesus christ. Can you corroborate that or add any... checkable details to that in any way? I was at that burn and that was really fucked up.
96.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
I definitely think cases like this can happen, and I've had troubles with some drug experiences in the past as well. That being said, the author's report of how they tried psilocybin sounds like a warning sign to me: 3 grams, seem
97.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
Yes, and these death-based analysis' also ignore the fact that both Fukishima and Chernobyl could have been much, much worse if major interventions were not made at the right moment. I always think about the Fukishima engineers who got
98.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
No, we cannot stop talking about the danger of meltdowns, because it is a proven danger, and a uniquely catastrophic one. Approximately once per decade, a nuclear reactor melts down and either does (Chernobyl) or nearly does (Fukishima) mak
99.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
The argument that costs will come down if we build more nuclear worked in the 1950s, but we know now where that goes now. Build More nuclear and costs come down. With more plants there are inevitably more nuclear incidents, the public reali
100.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
Soft agree. Mark’s job seems to be done. He did amazing at it 2005-2018ish, but there’s probably someone else who could do a better job today. Google and Microsoft have had enormous growth under hired CEOs in the last decade.
101.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
Being able to understand the way in which mathematical usage of phrases like “the same size as” is different than intuitive uses of the same phrase is becoming increasingly important. Only six months ago I was seeing a dozen YouTube videos
102.
▲
by
reso
3y ago
Canada triages MRI access to high-urgency cases. My partner got an immediate MRI and 3 follow-ups within a month when she presented at an ER with stroke symptoms.
103.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
This seems perfectly fair to me and I don't understand the controversy. Maybe in the US people see "State Affiliated" as some kind of an insult? Public broadcasters like the BBC and Al Jazeera have done extraordinary work at
104.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
LLMs create value but it's not yet clear how much.
105.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
I think watching the development of driverless cars in the last 15 years has taught a lot of people to be skeptical of 95% solutions. Sometimes you really need that 100% or the solution is practically useless.
106.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
The mistakes it makes are not "minor issues". I suspect that the mistakes are the rule, not the exception. The reason this isn't obvious at first is that the range of questions humans are likely to ask it is relatively constr
107.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
I have not seen that result, can you link it for me?
108.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
> "Many humans are parrots" This is becoming common belief among people in the AI field. I'm convinced it is a case of a metaphor overtaking reality. With the LLM model in mind, we can see how Humans are "kind of like
109.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
International treaties are very common. In fact, international research agreements are often easier than treaties because scientists and researchers are more likely to work together as colleagues than nation states.
110.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
To those saying "this is impossible in our society", there is a long history of scientific fields mutually agreeing to pause certain work until safety and regulations could be put in place. The Asilomar Conference is an example. [
111.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
Lots of people before have claimed there is a "perfect" or "final" aesthetic that is discoverable through science. They've all been surprised 20 or 30 years later when people started liking different things.
112.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
Honestly, I'll be that guy and say there is a genuine quality difference between CS schools. I went to one that is generally seen as top 5, and when I was studying for my undergrad courses, I would regularly find course notes from grad
113.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
I think its overplaying your hand to call this "socialism for the rich". It's just regulation. That being said, I do think its hilarious how many people who were promoting crypto as a way to destroy the regulatory state have
114.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
The creation and maintenance of moral hazard in our economy is a problem, but it is not a contributor to inflation, the causes of which are fairly clear of you just examine the components of recent increases in inflation.
115.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
I am also confused about where the money is coming from to cover SVB’s losses, if not from the taxpayer.
116.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
Almost like there is little difference between the major parties on economic issues.
117.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
The fed wasn't buying bonds for lulz, they were doing it to carry out their primary function.
118.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
The author appears to be subtweeting anti-nuclear activists. But I don't think waste is the issue most people worry about when they think about nuclear these days. Meltdowns are the real fear, and rightfully so.
119.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
Dunning-Kruger as a scientific result has been thoroughly discredited. The statistical effect they identified occurs in random data as much as real-world data. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking&#x
120.
▲
by
reso
4y ago
First time I heard about these objects I thought about this presentation for Google Loon, and all the research around high-altitude gliders that has taken place in recent decades. https://www.slideshare.net/Funk98/higha
More ›