reroute1

18 ms·

121.
by reroute1 7y ago
The paper mentions not using illusions and summons because of the added technical complexity required to make them work: "We removed these to avoid the added technical complexity of enabling the agent to control multiple units." S
122.
by reroute1 7y ago
> "By defeating theDota 2 world champion (Team OG), OpenAI Five demonstrates that self-play reinforcementlearning can achieve superhuman performance on a difficult task." Isn't this a bit of a leap though, it came with ma
123.
by reroute1 7y ago
Do you know examples of these services? What can you search for that does this?
124.
by reroute1 7y ago
Maybe it's not an issue for everyone? Maybe the bounce rates on average aren't that bad and some people are spending lots of time there? It's possible, but I agree they aren't very user-friendly in search results for som
125.
by reroute1 7y ago
I understand, but it's referencing the environment in a workplace that applies to both sexes not just women. Her complaint may have also applied to the men there, so really we should get both sides opinion shouldn't we?
126.
by reroute1 7y ago
Let's think liberally and not confine this concept to a strict acronym that seems overly narrow
127.
by reroute1 7y ago
You mean Ask People? What does any of that have to do with being a woman? Just blanket 'patriarchy bs'?
128.
by reroute1 7y ago
So in that case you are essentially using their products, because their software and services power lots of other services. There are alternatives, I just don't care enough to pursue them. Who cares if someone has tracked my data I lik
129.
by reroute1 7y ago
Right but you just mentioned siri, which is included on every iphone. People do carry that around and don't expect it to be listening.
130.
by reroute1 7y ago
What if your idea of proper is different then that countries laws?
131.
by reroute1 7y ago
You're right it's not anyones business, but in reality it's still not going to be anyones but yours. Unless there is some breach that or bad actor and but as mentioned that could just as easily be done to your phone.
132.
by reroute1 7y ago
So the websites you visit use their service then?
133.
by reroute1 7y ago
Mood, Affect, setting... I think these are well defined terms. That is what's meant by headspace. However it's not legal to test this in conjunction with illegal drugs, even scientifically they can't get approval in many case
134.
by reroute1 7y ago
The thing about that is it's hard to not have anecdotal evidence about a phenomenon when the item of study is an illegal drug. That doesn't mean there is no effect though and this one seems very logical. Also not exactly the same
135.
by reroute1 7y ago
OK, but by this definition of "willful deception" all social media companies and related engineering jobs can be lumped into a "repugnant" category? I think that is reductive of engineers opinions for one, and over-stati
136.
by reroute1 7y ago
How are they abusing privacy? Because it doesn't align with your views of privacy that constitutes abuse? You may have an expectation of privacy and we can argue whether or not that is valid. (not really IMO, facebook doesn't owe
137.
by reroute1 7y ago
Except for all those moderation jobs, and everyday office jobs, oh wait are they just people too and not "1%ers" ???
138.
by reroute1 7y ago
Repugnant is entirely your opinion and there are lots of people who disagree with you. It might be an amazing opportunity for some.
139.
by reroute1 7y ago
Wasn't instagram just recently experimenting with not showing the number of likes?
140.
by reroute1 7y ago
He. He's talking about the WeWork guy, not the theranos woman. I think it's a strange sentence, but technically correct.
141.
by reroute1 7y ago
"Some of the websites Google appears to have targeted in Google News were conservative sites and blogs, according to documents reviewed by the Journal." That is so vague and unsubstantiated. I don't come to that conclusion fr
142.
by reroute1 7y ago
No my counter is that the Google site posted above which started this has very little in common with "radical left identity politics"
143.
by reroute1 7y ago
You just linked 'diversity' to left and far-left, isn't that the same thing that started this side thread? How is that site linked with activism or left politics? You mentioned a "pretty clear" connection. I could j
144.
by reroute1 7y ago
> Google and most SV companies are somewhere between left to far-left. 1) Completely contradicts what you said earlier above 2) How? When does it stop being people and start being a corp? Aren't the decisions made by employees? 3) S
145.
by reroute1 7y ago
So Google is a ' left to far left' company except when it's being 'right to far right' sometimes?
146.
by reroute1 7y ago
Internet search isn't Google News, there are countless news outlets. Google News is still not radically political leaning and just an aggregator. None that implement any sane blacklisting could be completely bias free anyhow... It is l
147.
by reroute1 7y ago
I think it's nothing like censorship. They aren't restricting anyone's free speech. It is Google's platform and within their right to control the content displayed outside of organic search, in fact it's necessary.
148.
by reroute1 7y ago
If they were referencing organic search doesn't that hold true? They are blacklisting separate curated services such as google news. Either way if they lied about it of course that is bad, transparency is the way to gain public trust.
149.
by reroute1 7y ago
Isn't literally everything inferior to what COULD exist?
150.
by reroute1 7y ago
They are classifying results as featured or news. That is a judgement call. Those other sites still return in organic search results. You are mad because they didn't judge your political leanings to be news? It feels ridiculous to expe

More ›