reroute1

21 ms·

151.
by reroute1 7y ago
What a pointless comment. It's just a bunch of sarcasm with no information. I was doing part time delivery while freelancing a couple years ago. Please post something substantive not this junk.
152.
by reroute1 7y ago
I chose a clear biological difference to illustrate the point that was being argued, about one sample population disproving the larger trend. And it's not an unsupported claim there is plenty of science and argument for why men and wom
153.
by reroute1 7y ago
I could just as easily say you are looking at a biological difference and inferring a societal bias. Just because it doesn't exist in the same proportion everywhere doesn't mean that the difference is not biologically based. There
154.
by reroute1 7y ago
> There’s a lot of motivated reasoning by men that their innate characteristics are selected for computer programming. There’s a lot of hostile behavior by men towards women who are in computer science. You can view this like any other r
155.
by reroute1 7y ago
Yes but only in very poorly designed systems. We have those now with AI it's no different. I still see no reason to jump from 2 to 3 other than incompetence in design.
156.
by reroute1 7y ago
Guessing because it's like a programming workout (exercise)
157.
by reroute1 7y ago
I used to take the train into Union Station at Chicago every day and I thought I recognized parts of the model almost right away, it really is quite well done.
158.
by reroute1 7y ago
Totally wrong, his arguments were from the current era of science and not racist. They weren't even close to that.
159.
by reroute1 7y ago
Weren't there like 4 TV channels to begin with. It's been trending this way for a long time.
160.
by reroute1 7y ago
So? It's still force in alignment with the majority. That is better than force in alignment with one central power that may or may not have public interest.
161.
by reroute1 7y ago
Maybe this was a more novel thing to discover 15-20 years ago? Perhaps it is people and their opinions that have changed?
162.
by reroute1 7y ago
But how is this different than political ads on the radio or tv or a billboard? Sounds like you are against political advertisements of any kind. I don't disagree there could be damage done by misinformation, but I don't think tha
163.
by reroute1 7y ago
Why should they? People can make up their own minds we don't need to restrict online advertisements. False messages appear in all other forms of advertisement, facebook or twitter is no different.
164.
by reroute1 7y ago
OK so you have no more information than anyone else? We all have friends who talk about relationships and its all anecdata. Not to mention you have a very specific group of open and non-standard people which could give a very different sele
165.
by reroute1 7y ago
You are essentially arguing that all gender studies are useless because there is parity among individuals in each gender. It's true there is parity, but the scientific division between male and female is very clear. It seems VERY usefu
166.
by reroute1 7y ago
Getting one side of the story is not getting the whole story.
167.
by reroute1 7y ago
He's talking about evolution though, and it definitely seems to hold up for our past as a species.
168.
by reroute1 7y ago
I agree, also this should have been called why to be pretty good at lots of things.
169.
by reroute1 7y ago
Or conversely she could be rewarded for fixing the underlying problems and given a new, possibly similar task.
170.
by reroute1 7y ago
And as someone living in Chicago or any similar metro area with strong seasonal weather can tell you, there are far higher crime rates in the summer than in the winter. Young people have more down time in the summer and people are outside a
171.
by reroute1 7y ago
How is sex on public tv a better indicator?
172.
by reroute1 7y ago
They probably are a minority, but how does that relate? There are still millions of people participating in the game, having more spectators doesn't negate the participants. If anything I think that would reinforce it being a good game
173.
by reroute1 7y ago
I disagree. Lots of the streams I enjoy are largely based on the personality of the streamer and their interaction with viewers. If you start removing their freedoms of what they can and can't say that would heavily impact their intera
174.
by reroute1 7y ago
I'm not disagreeing that it goes against company mission/guidelines, but if part of your product is player streams and you give them a caveat of not having the ability to freely express opinions that is going to be an incredibly b
175.
by reroute1 7y ago
Professional players maybe, but how many millions and millions of recreational players? Most gamers aren't pros either.
176.
by reroute1 7y ago
No opinions of any kind... sounds like a super interesting stream!
177.
by reroute1 7y ago
I would say in general I agree with your point, but there are many pure skill games that have large audiences. Like most sports have incredibly low RNG compared to something like poker, but have giant audiences.
178.
by reroute1 7y ago
That could be a big conflict of interest though. What if the intelligent financial decision is not in line with your morals? I am all for people running away from investing in these companies, but in reality that is a conflicting request of
179.
by reroute1 7y ago
just cancelled my WoW sub
180.
by reroute1 7y ago
Great now you're able to eat one crappy meal forever. Maybe people want variety and taste and don't have time to invest in that?? Maybe people live in an area not near a good grocery store, which is VERY common in lower income are

More ›