rendall

17 ms·

181.
by rendall 1y ago
Your solution?
182.
by rendall 1y ago
Solidly anti-Israel. Like "somewhat pregnant" there is no "somewhat pro-Israel". Either you believe that Israel has the right to exist, that its public statements are reasonably accurate reflections of its intentions, an
183.
by rendall 1y ago
You are arguing for confirmation bias, unfortunately. It costs you nothing to understand Israeli perspectives. You don't have to agree, but you will elevate the discourse.
184.
by rendall 1y ago
It's your belief that they have been uncovered more than once?
185.
by rendall 1y ago
Let's assume for the sake of argument that Israel has decided to starve out Gazans in order to end the war. You have the choice to save them by offering a better solution. What is it? "Not X!" is a copout. Unfortunately for
186.
by rendall 1y ago
"The solution is certainty not x" is not a solution. Saying "it's not x" is easy. If you really believe that Gazans are being starved, then save them by coming up with a great solution for Israel. Let's hear
187.
by rendall 1y ago
It's unfortunate and notable that whenever Israel hits the front page of HN and avoids getting flagged, the perspective is reliably anti-Israel. It's worth recalling that confirmation bias, which we’re all prone to, kicks in hard
188.
by rendall 1y ago
Why?
189.
by rendall 1y ago
> This post explores the journey of building this specialized deployment option for regulated industries where data sovereignty isn't just preferred—it's mandatory. This is an AI writing tell: "It's not just x—it&#x
190.
by rendall 1y ago
My deepest condolences.
191.
by rendall 1y ago
It's fun when posters inadvertently reveal far more about themselves than whatever they are discussing, such as "Western cultural success" as here.
192.
by rendall 1y ago
Why not move to a European country and acquire citizenship through normal means?
193.
by rendall 1y ago
From the community guidelines: > In Comments > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. > Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divi
194.
by rendall 1y ago
It's not ambiguous that api/users/signup refers to a resource. One of the constraints of REST is that endpoints refer to resources.
195.
by rendall 1y ago
Every dev generation writes this essay, so this pops up again every 5 years or so.
196.
by rendall 1y ago
I came here to say this. Of course she is understandably emotional after coming so close to a terrible death.
197.
by rendall 1y ago
Same. And REST for short ;)
198.
by rendall 1y ago
Rest easy, Daigle is legally immune from concern trolling.
199.
by rendall 1y ago
Your theory is that Daigle is at risk of a Canadian prosecutor hauling him into court based on the criminal complaint of a Uruguayan purveyor of stalkerware? That's novel.
200.
by rendall 1y ago
That would be an amusing exercise in self-incrimination & discovery pain for Catwatchful. They would also have to quantify business losses, which requires admitting the value of an illicit enterprise. But YOLO am I right? LFG!
201.
by rendall 1y ago
https://archive.is/Nr1hH
202.
by rendall 1y ago
They cloned (not forked) the repo, removed the history, claimed it as their own, and changed the license. This is not a mistake
203.
by rendall 1y ago
Also porn. Let's be honest, all of this energy expenditure is about porn.
204.
by rendall 1y ago
What is Hims ?
205.
by rendall 1y ago
I read this letter and then immediately read another discussion on HN, A new pyramid-like shape always lands the same side up https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44381297
206.
Strangers 2 in-universe tourist info website(visitvenusoregon.com)
1 points by rendall 1y ago|0 comments
207.
by rendall 1y ago
This is illuminating: > "high-risk to users due to the lack of transparency in how it protects user data..." > "We disagree with the House Chief Administrative Officer's characterization in the strongest possibl
208.
by rendall 1y ago
If a psychedelic experience leads to humility, repentance, and love, how do you know it was “of the flesh”? Could it not be a moment when the Spirit spoke through the weakness of flesh, as God does often in scripture? If God can use a burni
209.
by rendall 1y ago
Hmm. You know this reveals more about you than it does about "nature", right? If you're serious, I suggest sincerely that you see a therapist, and not allow yourself to be alone with women (or otherwise whomever you are attra
210.
by rendall 1y ago
That’s a helpful reference. Thank you. But I understand pharmakeia to refer more to sorcery or deception, not to altered states or chemical use in general. Otherwise, wouldn’t every medication also fall under this condemnation? If someone

More ›