register

20 ms·

181.
Condor Emacs: Emacs distribution focused on C/C++(github.com)
2 points by register 7y ago|0 comments
182.
by register 7y ago
Agreed that it can be done but at a considerable cost. Translating every assignment into a function call is within what I didn't consider feasible from a practical point of view. The best research papers I saw on this topic proposed to
183.
by register 7y ago
Debugging is not a problem per se. As an example you can see how Nim generates debugging info while transpiling to C with the --debuginfo --linedir:on options. The real problem with C transpilation is proper garbage collection support. A C
184.
PAIP: Run Common Lisp in Browser?(github.com)
68 points by register 7y ago|29 comments
185.
by register 7y ago
Can you be more specific? Documentations: tutorials, a book like learn godot in 24x7, or a set of tutorials= Templates: mini-games, reusable piece of logic? Placeholder assets: can you provide some examples? Thanks
186.
by register 7y ago
An interesting question to address is whether there is space for developing a low price commercial version of Godot. What feature would you be willing to pay for?
187.
Scheme to be split into two languages(infoq.com)
4 points by register 7y ago|0 comments
188.
by register 7y ago
Not easy at all if you don't have any connection. Applying by simply sending a CV won't work at all. It's a different story once you're in then finding a job is pretty easy. I have several friends that have tried and the
189.
US investors have plowed a record $5.3 bilion into European startups this year(businessinsider.com)
1 points by register 7y ago|0 comments
190.
by register 7y ago
Is there anybody that has experience with any of these? I have tried to play for a day or so both with xtlang and Scopes and was disappointed. At the time when I tried Scopes it was not even clear how to properly manage memory. In the case
191.
by register 7y ago
I suggest Common Lisp. If you can afford to spend money go with Allegro Common Lisp or Lispwork. The best open source implementation is SBCL that works best on Linux. If you want to avoid commercial implementations don't expect any fan
192.
by register 7y ago
Because I don't want to deal with exchange rates risks as Jacquesm already pointed out.
193.
Ask HN: How to invest safely in Europe?
81 points by register 7y ago|54 comments
194.
by register 7y ago
The cost jumped to 37,99$ and the coupon had no effect. At this price it costs too much. I should have bought it yesterday.
195.
Show HN: Interesting cross platform language and SDK (maybe a little immature)(ecere.org)
1 points by register 7y ago|0 comments
196.
by register 7y ago
What does it mean that it has an incremental compiler? Does it support hot code reloading like Common Lisp?
197.
by register 7y ago
Does the GC ( and the language ) support OS threads natively?
198.
by register 8y ago
> a variant of the C language designed for incremental compilation This is extremely interesting per se and I wonder why it didn't catch up. Is there anything similar available today? It would be interesting to know more about the o
199.
by register 8y ago
I tried Revise and the fact that it doesn't require you to restart Julia doesn't mean that it allows you to change code on the fly. It means that you don't have to close the REPL and restart it and that you don't have to
200.
by register 8y ago
This should be a game changer. I had tried Julia before and was disappointed by the interactivity of the REPL because redefinition of code at runtime was anything but easy to achieve. If it works as stated Julia REPL now should be on par wi
201.
by register 8y ago
I am curious to know which domain you are using CL professionally. Can you tell us a little bit more? Also are you using an Open Source CL or a commercial one? P.S: mmmh... I guess you are working for Righetti right?
202.
Ask HN: SRE Manager at Google. Initial Pre Screen Interview
3 points by register 8y ago|0 comments
203.
by register 8y ago
It's still an alpha language. I would never deploy something in production with it.
204.
by register 8y ago
All of them have shortcomings when one wants multi-threading. Javascript , Python and Lua implementations are single threaded. Perl is slow. LISP is ideal but the commercial distributions with these features have licesing costs of thousand
205.
by register 8y ago
This is exactly what I was looking for. There's no real option for a language that allows interactive coding and it's easily embeddable. Please open source asap. You will get contributors starting with me.
206.
by register 8y ago
The main issues that prevents me to have an interest in Pharo are the following two: - There is no real multithreading support - It's not easily embeddable I believe that there are attempts to tackle these problems but what is the stat
207.
by register 8y ago
For whom live in San Fransisco. Is it really like that? I don't work for a fancy company, don't live in a fancy city and I work on boring enterprise problems but I live considerably better than that. I would accept those condition
208.
What living in San Francisco on a tech salary really looks like(businessinsider.com)
1 points by register 8y ago|1 comments
209.
by register 8y ago
I always found "Lisp in small pieces" extremely heavy to read. It's not the content per se but I find the writing style baroque to say the least . I attempted to read it twice and never went further than the 2nd chapter. Am I
210.
by register 8y ago
I wrote an important piece of the business logic that compensate trasactions in the ATM circuit of my country. I also wrote the transcoding and CMS component of a video streaming application that is used all around the world by several broa

More ›