realjhol

16 ms·

121.
by realjhol 4y ago
Far from perfect? Have you seen the latest data? We now know for example, that the risk of being hospitalised due to vaccine side effects is orders of magnitude more likely than that the vaccines will save you from being hospitalised with C
122.
by realjhol 4y ago
He reacted to the Rasmussen poll which said that 53% of black people in the US disagree with the statement "it's ok to be white", and suggested it would be wise to "stay the hell away" and "there's no fixi
123.
by realjhol 4y ago
Well then it must be legit. Who among us hasn't accidentally leaked a cryptographic secret key to a screeching vtuber who has the exact same accent as we do.
124.
by realjhol 4y ago
Asahi Lina has the same spanish-sounding accent as Hector but pitched up and falsetto. "raider" - the hostname of the developer machine is that same as the hostname of Hector's machine. He even did a super-cringe "take o
125.
by realjhol 4y ago
It's just Marcan being weird and creepy.
126.
by realjhol 4y ago
From my own experience, my marriage went through a rough patch. Though for us, divorce is not something we believe is permissible in most cases. This forced us to work through our problems with the help of a therapist. With lots of hard wor
127.
by realjhol 4y ago
My point is that people react to incentives. At the moment the incentives are stacked up to keep people unmarried, childless and miserable. We have control over the incentives, so lets choose incentives designed to make people happy.
128.
by realjhol 4y ago
This is all in your head guy. You started throwing all these smears around, and now having done so, you congratulate yourself for having such virtue and integrity for despising these people. It all just boils down to a fig-leaf for your hat
129.
by realjhol 4y ago
1. Women are not happy with the current arrangement - that's the point of this article. They have power to create change by demanding men raise their game. If they wish to. 2. If you make a public promise to stay with someone "&#x
130.
by realjhol 4y ago
You're attitude to people is absolutely toxic. Why are you surprised that people side against you?
131.
by realjhol 4y ago
No. It includes anyone who is opposes left wing ideas and is effective.
132.
by realjhol 4y ago
> The science is settled. Well, we'll see. There are predictions of global devastation within the next decade. > But physics doesn't care if you want it to be true or not. It's not about that. Rather it's about the
133.
by realjhol 4y ago
> How very sad for you. Someone running a private server doesn't want you coming into their living room and taking a dump on the floor, metaphorically speaking. I'm sure if you look around you can find an instance where sexist
134.
by realjhol 4y ago
How? One's political views are largely an expression of innate personality traits. And, as we have seen, the basket of deplorable includes anyone who is not explicitly left wing.
135.
by realjhol 4y ago
That's because you're not in the "basket of deplorables"
136.
by realjhol 4y ago
Ok- but what if the planet isn't destroyed after all? What makes you believe we have any control over the climate? What makes you believe that in the sham democracy, your vote makes any difference?
137.
by realjhol 4y ago
I had to leave an instance because the maintainer said pro-life views were forbidden. Didn't matter whether you expressed them or not - the owner had a policy against private opinions. I agree with your point about freedom of associati
138.
by realjhol 4y ago
First we reject this Whig History nonsense that history is an inevitable march forward. It is clear we have gone badly off course. We have chosen a future that is making people desperately unhappy. So we need to re-adopt things that were ca
139.
by realjhol 4y ago
Modern society is like a conjurer who whacks your heirloom rolex with a mallet for a trick. When all that remains is a pile of cogs, broken glass and twisted metal, it suddenly dawns on him.... he's forgotten the end of the trick. Mod
140.
by realjhol 4y ago
It is whig history, though. It's really not complicated
141.
by realjhol 4y ago
That's the thing though, it's not absence at all. He's alluding to consent-based morality - a moral system that is both disastrous and unlivable in practice. You can't have an absence of notions when it comes to morality
142.
by realjhol 4y ago
I'm not advancing a view about sexual ethics, I'm just amused that you believe that your own pre-conceived notions about sexual ethics must agree with a universal moral order which is also a fact of nature. How convenient. > I
143.
by realjhol 4y ago
For all their claims to be intrepid truth seekers, the media today are simple weather vanes and mouth-peaces of regime power.
144.
by realjhol 4y ago
It's all just Whig History. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_history
145.
by realjhol 4y ago
> How people ought to live, is commonly built up from principles and axioms inspired by natural law. You have it backwards. Belief in natural laws is an axiom. Hardly anyone actually chooses their axioms. They're either handed to us
146.
by realjhol 4y ago
> For most of my life I've adhered to this idea - however I've come to believe, against my own protests, that the universe does, in fact, embed something like a moral code So what if it does? > So, I don't think the uni
147.
by realjhol 4y ago
Why? The same people who support the idea behind this article, support the idea that men and women are equal, for example, because they think it ought to be so. And there's a lot more things they say ought to be true that I won&#x2
148.
by realjhol 4y ago
What a foolish concept. The article is basically made of non-sequiters. The central issue is that a telescope can show you what is . It can never tell you how people ought to live. The is-ought distinction is the boundary of science into
149.
by realjhol 4y ago
Indeed I am.
150.
by realjhol 4y ago
> I just think that purely from a technical standpoint, allowing a bot to praise Hitler, Trump or Stalin are pretty much the same thing, as the undesirable parts of their policies are about the same. What? Are you for real? - not just tr

More ›