Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rdtsc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
661.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
And of course, if you use LaTeX, and need coffee stains on your paper there is a package for it: https://ctan.math.illinois.edu/graphics/pgf/contrib/coffeest...
662.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Ah perfect! Thanks for sharing the article.
663.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> you find that the number of nearly orthogonal dimensions within n dimensional space is exponential with regards to n. nit for the nit (micro nit!): Is it meant to be "a number of nearly orthogonal directions within n dimensional
664.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
I recently rewatched https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly_Man . It's a Werner Herzog film about Timothy Treadwell's story. It's a classic story of "well, his heart was definitely in the right place&
665.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> Criminals, by and large, are stupid. They don't think it through. They just do stuff. I guess the typical reply is that we mostly know about the stupid ones who get caught. But it would depend on the crime types, I guess. With som
666.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Agree, that would make sense. I can see if he was just some artist and doing it as performance art or to make some commentary a topic, he could defend it as such. But with cryptocurrency involved it looks like fraud.
667.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> “You can see the PTSD in my eyes, right?” he said before telling this reporter to leave. He was dead, with an obituary even and now back to being alive. Why the PTSD?! He should be rejoicing! /s But I wonder, is faking your death
668.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> The government has repeatedly pointed to existing legislation that criminalises the incitement to hatred and hate speech, under the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989. In 2017, the Irish Courts Service said just five people w
669.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Ah no worries at all. Thanks for sharing your library! I think a good start could be rebar3's new app output. rebar3 new app myapp That generates a src directory, a rebar.config file and a .gitignore file. The .gitignore would
670.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> Interoperability makes them very companionable The syntax is different, but they can call libraries from other each. I guess are you thinking from the perspective of someone using this library in their code? Well, that argues for writi
671.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
I think it's about the same level of effort when it's not followed by specific suggestions or pointers about what's better for this project, what modules functions might disappear with improved abstractions with a different l
672.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Looks great, thanks for sharing! I just noticed you committed your .beam files and the _build directory. I think that's a bit unusual. If you don't use specific features of jsx and can restrict compatibility to more recent version
673.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> I guess bias towards the language, its design and syntax. Ok, but the way the question is framed ("why not use Elixir for this?") presents it like some kind of an universal obvious choice. But I (and I guess the gp poster) do
674.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Maybe because the weight was "close enough", at least closer than iron, so they figured they must be closely related. So we just need a "little bit" of work to it make shiny and beautiful and 40% heavier or so. And I am
675.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Another, reason products end in "purgatory" is that the customer is already using something like it. During market research that's the final question people forget to ask. You might ask "Do you have a need for this produ
676.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Well done, I really like the animations and the explanation. Especially the case where it's a graph and we can drag ahead or click "shuffle 100 times" One thing that threw me for a bit is when it switched from the intro of pi
677.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
>> "meet our customers' needs while mitigating risks and maximizing benefit." > I love seeing example of phrases like this out in the wild I can image that's the stuff kids would say when asked why is the candy
678.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Absolutely! Every time I see it mentioned, I end up browsing it just marveling what a nice job they did. It's laid well very well, has just the right information, it's lightning fast, I like the color scheme. If there is a UI desi
679.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Perhaps they are targeting community colleges in general, because of the proportion of online course there is higher and they usually have fewer IT and administrative workers to keep an eye on things. That's disheartening, community co
680.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Oh sure, if you run your own server or sell your cloud as a service, you can enable it. But if you want to run on someone else’s setup, you have to play by their rules. > Disabling io_uring because “guy on the internet said so” or “$faan
681.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> But "sending them to prison for the crime of applying for asylum" is the position in power at the moment, But if they applied for asylum doesn't the US govt already have their information in order to, well, process the a
682.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
That's pretty wild. Was it an "investment" of some sort, and then the CEO got a hint with a wink, that there is more where it came from if they don't enable any encryption. Anyone from Rovio who got less than $10m in the
683.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
That's a good summary, thanks! It covers Pell Grants well. > A former college president and financial aid director in Atlanta used the names of former students and individuals who never attended the college to fraudulently obtain $5
684.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> If you collect this data, and enroll a student who is seeking asylum > a student who is seeking asylum, the current administration will attempt to get this data from you to send your student to life in prison in El Salvador. That co
685.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Like others mentioned, they describe the 'agonizing' problem, but don't explain how it works. The most charitable read is it's just plain old lazy journalism, the least charitable is they are hiding something and dancing
686.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> Why do they refer to Claude in third person? Why not say "You're Claude and you enjoy helping hoomans"? But why would they say that? To me that seems a bit childish. Like, say, when writing a script do people say "Y
687.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> evilginx updated the severity from none to high Well the reporter in the report that stated it that they are open for employment https://hackerone.com/reports/3125832 Anyone want to hire them? They can play with C
688.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
> Making LLMs know what they don't know is a hard problem. Many attempts at making them refuse to answer what they don't know caused them to refuse to answer things they did in fact know. They are the perfect "fake it till
689.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Previous discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43874641 Link to the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.17288
690.
▲
by
rdtsc
1y ago
Very little at primary school level is controlled federally. It’s mostly state and school district based. That has both good and bad ramifications but it’s just how it is.
More ›