rater266

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rater266 4y ago

   I'll add that even though the pay rates were nominally quoted per hour, under Leapforce, it was really task-based because they wouldn't pay more than AET. I know raters had their invoices rejected if their productivity was materia
2. 2.▲
   by rater266 4y ago

   There were different time allotments per task, yes. In the Raterhub era, each task had an "Average Estimated Time" (AET) set by Google. A typical 5x5 side-by-side search result comparison task would have been 9 minutes, for exampl
3. 3.▲
   by rater266 4y ago

   AOL got in hot water for this. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Community_Leader_Program
4. 4.▲
   by rater266 4y ago

   Former longtime Leapforce/RaterLabs preferred/senior rater here. There was always some exploitation going on, but it got way worse under Ruth Porat's tenure. Standard Leapforce US English raters were paid $13.50/hr. If y