rasengan

52 ms·

631.
by rasengan 6y ago
> sort of the same way DNS happened. Actually, almost everything happened that way in the history of mankind, right? xD > the people who start that infrastructure do it with a traded coin All the names could be registered by one monop
632.
by rasengan 6y ago
With all due respect, this comment reflects a poor understanding of decentralized projects and, particularly, public blockchains. > the owners are ... selling the DNS naming hierarchy The blockchain is providing names in a global namespa
633.
by rasengan 6y ago
The 8th document [1] made it clear to me that alien life exists and a coverup took place as records make it appear that Dr. Davidson had a different stance. We are not alone. [1] https://documents2.theblackvault.com/document
634.
by rasengan 6y ago
> This appears to be just another commercialisation of domain names, trying to create another "Gold Rush" for the most sought after names. Winner-take-all. A few profit at the expense of the many. This is a major problem that t
635.
by rasengan 6y ago
> But it sounds like handshake is simply an alternate DNS protocol? Handshake [1] is the next generation of DNS, as opposed to the ICANN controlled legacy system. It is more decentralized since a single actor does not control the system
636.
The Uncensored Web Adoption Leaderboard(dns.live)
1 points by rasengan 6y ago|0 comments
637.
Handshake (Uncensorable Web) Explainer Video(youtube.com)
2 points by rasengan 6y ago|0 comments
638.
by rasengan 6y ago
Cloudflare doesn’t yet resolve handshake names, but hopefully this changes soon. Paging @jgc !
639.
by rasengan 6y ago
I do understand your point, but it’s hard to win the hearts and minds of anyone if you’re censored and cannot be heard. Secondly, this is hacker news. Our culture is to route around these kinds of things. ;)
640.
by rasengan 6y ago
It resolves for me! Try installing a handshake resolver directly like hsd [1] for full chain or hnsd [2] for SPV. [1] https://GitHub.com/handshake-org/hsd [2] https://GitHub.com/handshake-org/hnsd
641.
by rasengan 6y ago
It doesn’t require docker! You can install directly on windows, Mac and Linux [1]. This is how I have it running (for the past 8 months)! https://github.com/handshake-org/hsd
642.
by rasengan 6y ago
Handshake and Sia Sky together delivers a decentralized website.
643.
by rasengan 6y ago
Resolves for me: $ host sci-hub.hns sci-hub.hns has address 186.2.163.57
644.
by rasengan 6y ago
Exactly. It doesn’t require strictly from a protocol sense, but from a security perspective you do want to validate certificates ON TOP as you said.
645.
by rasengan 6y ago
I think what he meant was that the domain resolution can be validated using the blockchain as opposed to needing a centralized/single actor certificate authority.
646.
Sci-Hub Is Now on the ‘Uncensorable Web’(nasdaq.com)
842 points by rasengan 6y ago|397 comments
647.
Ask HN: Where Is Jack Ma?
28 points by rasengan 6y ago|10 comments
648.
by rasengan 6y ago
Private.sh is between Imperial Family Companies [1] and Gigablast! [1] https://imperialfamily.com/
649.
by rasengan 6y ago
To prevent this, you can use the extension [1]! [1] https://private.sh/extension.html
650.
by rasengan 6y ago
The difference between Private.sh and other search engines is that search engines that state they are private require you to trust they aren't logging and saving your searches. Private.sh doesn't have to be trusted. It encrypts y
651.
Private.sh: Verifiable Private Search(private.sh)
3 points by rasengan 6y ago|4 comments
652.
by rasengan 6y ago
Regardless of https, ddg or startpage see your IP address and search query and you'll have to trust they don't log it even passively. In this case, your query is encrypted on the client side, passed through a proxy, decrypted at t
653.
by rasengan 6y ago
Private.sh ( https://private.sh ) actually encrypts your search query and washes it thru a proxy prior to delivering it to the search engine entity which decrypts it, performs the search, and encrypts the results before sending
654.
by rasengan 6y ago
To be able to exploit these "critical flaws" in SGX is quite difficult in the real world. That said, I agree that it could happen in extraordinary circumstances. If you fall under these extraordinary circumstances, you really sh
655.
by rasengan 6y ago
> You can't cryptographically verify that the system you are using doesn't have backdoors Yes you can, there are many methods including but not limited to SGX among other things.
656.
by rasengan 6y ago
It’s not about what you do but, instead, setting goals and meeting or exceeding them. If you have a goal to be fit, and you’re very serious about reaching it, then you’ll try different fitness programs until you get to the goal. Then, set a
657.
by rasengan 6y ago
This is poorly thought out. It’s clear that there were no actual experts in the room. Trust is something we used to count on years ago. Since cryptography has gone mainstream, we don’t rely so much on trust but instead verification and zero
658.
WWW: We Will Win(youtube.com)
1 points by rasengan 6y ago|0 comments
659.
Nomad: A Decentralized Twitter Built on Footnote(nmd.co)
2 points by rasengan 6y ago|0 comments
660.
by rasengan 6y ago
To be clear, China isn’t censoring these companies - the traitors running the companies are censoring them on behalf of China.

More ›