rasengan

44 ms·

481.
IRC.com(irc.com)
3 points by rasengan 5y ago|2 comments
482.
by rasengan 5y ago
heh
483.
by rasengan 5y ago
pocket change
484.
Thats is how you make IRC go to a whole new level(chit.freenode.net)
5 points by rasengan 5y ago|2 comments
485.
Show HN: Chat Anonymously on IRC(github.com)
5 points by rasengan 5y ago|0 comments
486.
by rasengan 5y ago
SS: Posted the BBS [1] yesterday, but here is the code. This was written quickly and will likely undergo a refactor, but it's a proof of concept of what's possible when building on IRC. [1] https://bbs.freenode.net&#x2
487.
Freenode BBS(bbs.freenode.net)
11 points by rasengan 5y ago|7 comments
488.
by rasengan 5y ago
> When a FOSS project updates its own website to clarify that they want nothing to do with you, we don't have wonder what's going on. Yes. Edit: To be clear, what I'm pointing out is that it's not in fact entire proje
489.
by rasengan 5y ago
As I noted, things aren't exactly as they appear [1]. Make no mistake, FOSS is under attack. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27299538
490.
by rasengan 5y ago
This should have been communicated better and for that I apologize. We published a draft policy update and worked with the community in #freenode-policy-feedback to understand the community's wishes. The policy was updated today to ma
491.
by rasengan 5y ago
These channels were already already closed. We removed the topics and forwarded users to an off-topic channel with the same name. If your channel was incorrectly marked in this, please let our staff know and we'll remediate it asap. T
492.
Freenode Exists for FOSS(freenode.net)
20 points by rasengan 5y ago|22 comments
493.
by rasengan 5y ago
The policy page you listed said no spamming. Your blog complaint says you spammed.
494.
by rasengan 5y ago
Freenode maintains a policy against spam [1]. This policy hasn’t changed for years. If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to contact freenode support. Secondly, you come to conclusions that have no basis from your explana
495.
Freenode Live (2018)(freenode.live)
2 points by rasengan 5y ago|0 comments
496.
by rasengan 5y ago
This is not true. As a single example, conferences cost money to throw - significant money. We did two. The FOSS community loves these events to be clear.
497.
by rasengan 5y ago
Freenode > 1m
498.
by rasengan 5y ago
Freenode was staffed by volunteers but it was never managed by them. They were recruited by management. Let’s not rewrite history any further, please.
499.
by rasengan 5y ago
Probably would not be wise to guess or speculate and instead go by what I have actually said. The issue with services was because the previous team pulled our mail server and all its contents. We had to abruptly get everything in place. As
500.
by rasengan 5y ago
#2 is very false
501.
by rasengan 5y ago
> There will be few noticeable changes in terms of day-to-day operations, the freenode project will continue to operate with much the same structure and volunteer base as it does now." And it absolutely did until it didn’t (as per t
502.
by rasengan 5y ago
He’s not my employee and I said he’s friends with both sides. I would say that makes him neutral.
503.
by rasengan 5y ago
Check the messages about the DNS in the pdf. Thanks Thomas for caring! You seldom seem to miss replying to my comments, and I appreciate it.
504.
by rasengan 5y ago
> someone named christel somehow sold you an IRC network 5 years ago, unbeknownst (until recently) to the people operating the IRC network on their own servers. This is false [1]. The PDF clarifies a great many of the unanswered question
505.
by rasengan 5y ago
He didn’t improperly act as you said and was not interested in this situation other than for the benefit of irc. To be clear, I have sponsored so many FOSS projects in the past and it’s pretty common knowledge within FOSS — for example even
506.
by rasengan 5y ago
It did until I was locked out of the dns and an internal reorganization and structure was put in place. The screenshots from former staff agenda is on the PDF. I don’t wish to be on irc 24/7 contrary to what people might or might not t
507.
by rasengan 5y ago
The DNS dispute is when I, who owned the domains, was cut off from the domains and simply asked for it back. As you can see I was approached by freenode to buy freenode please don’t twist it. Did you read the PDF with the screenshots?
508.
by rasengan 5y ago
I agree and you’re very welcome!
509.
by rasengan 5y ago
Did you read the PDF? It’s actually really clear there. Lots of defamatory and false comments were made by the former staff - which are proven to be false in the document. In terms of the ownership, it was on the main blog and website for
510.
by rasengan 5y ago
It is ritual defamation [1]. This has been apparently going on for quite some time [2]. [1] http://techrights.org/2021/04/29/ritual-defamation/ [2] https://phanes.silogroup.org/vae-victi

More ›