rasengan

28 ms·

361.
by rasengan 5y ago
The pain the parents must be feeling is unimaginable and will never heal. This is an example of failure of society -- you give up freedoms to gain securities, but then these securities aren't delivered and you are left upset why the s
362.
by rasengan 5y ago
> The shooting appeared to be a random act involving individuals participating in the reckless discharge of firearms. While the second amendment arms US citizens and for reason, simultaneously, the punishment should be 100x greater than
363.
by rasengan 5y ago
Isn’t Mozilla hugely funded? Do they pay the maintainer?
364.
by rasengan 5y ago
I ran Linux on a 486 DX for quite some time including providing shells to people on IRC. Don't run X and it's more than powerful enough.
365.
by rasengan 5y ago
This is seriously gross AF.
366.
by rasengan 5y ago
> blockchain I agree - DNS is the second best use case for blockchain [1] to money. [1] https://handshake.org/
367.
Decentralized Naming and Certificate Authority(handshake.org)
4 points by rasengan 5y ago|1 comments
368.
by rasengan 5y ago
Great job on this project - really cool and useful. I put a tiny-PR on the README with a note about gaining TLS functionality through stunnel [1] (all good if it isn't merged, but figured it might be helpful to those who wish to use w
369.
by rasengan 5y ago
Cryptocurrency* not crypto [1] which is what the UK is going after [2]. [1] cryptography [2] https://noplacetohide.org.uk/
370.
by rasengan 5y ago
Ending encryption to protect children is a fallacy. Further, I don’t understand how they can actually manage to do this without weakening all encryption on the internet. Very strange moves that aren’t well thought out at all with a single f
371.
by rasengan 5y ago
> "SHA-1 Federal ROOT CA" > "DoD Subordinate CAs (SHA-1)" > "DoD ECA Root CA 2 (SHA-1)" > "DoD Root CA 2 (SHA-1)" > -- https://militarycac.com/images/fed_crosscert2
372.
by rasengan 5y ago
> I was klined for saying "ensenga" so I wasn't around to see what really happened > You did that to his channel tho lmao Sigh.
373.
by rasengan 5y ago
Every single man and woman who has given their life to ensure that knowledge was available to all and not in the hands of a select few. There are too many to count and far too many to name. Who were you referring to?
374.
by rasengan 5y ago
That's unfortunate about your channel - I really do wish the former staff didn't stage a hostile take over and begin their attack on freenode. It's really unfortunate, and I'm sorry for that. As for your comment on Hands
375.
by rasengan 5y ago
I think attorneys who specialize in this know better than you? Sorry for the delay in response as well, you kept changing this comment to try to sway the narrative a certain way, so I had to wait until you finished your edits to make sure m
376.
by rasengan 5y ago
Again, the narrative one wishes to hear, but, to be clear: [0] No different from Microsoft taking control of a repository that many relied upon. [1] There was an active spam attack going on. [x1] [2] IRC cloud deceptively labeled freenode a
377.
by rasengan 5y ago
> I'm aware of one, and if it's the one I'm thinking of, he didn't so much "give his life for the cause" as tragically commit suicide because he couldn't see a way out of legal pressure put on him (whic
378.
by rasengan 5y ago
Depends on if you look at it based on a narrative that the former-staff wanted people to hear, or if you base it on the truth [1][2]. Specifically, this person states that I was in a position to "abuse my power" at freenode, such
379.
by rasengan 5y ago
Even with a CIC, the Operation continues [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_In_Our_Sites
380.
by rasengan 5y ago
It doesn't seem different from "install this app" to access our services though? And clearly, this model has proliferated with fluidity.
381.
by rasengan 5y ago
Those servers are only necessary for the ICANN tlds and those will continue to act as they do today, even in a Handshake future. With Handshake, you run your own authoritative server (or use a hosted one) for your own name and that authorit
382.
by rasengan 5y ago
One of the main reasons that ICE believes they can exert this authority is because the .com/.net TLD namespace is owned and operated by Verisign, a US company. Further, the ICANN namespace is owned and operated by ICANN, a US company
383.
by rasengan 5y ago
Not sure where you got that title from. The actual title is: "US claims all .com and .net websites are in its jurisdiction" which is virtually the same as the title of the HN thread. The literal first sentence is: "THE US Imm
384.
by rasengan 5y ago
I think it's possible it could be considered piracy in the US, but not all countries follow these same rules nor schools of thought. The issue is that the jurisdiction bleeds into others' jurisdictions that might have different ru
385.
by rasengan 5y ago
It could be illegal in the US, but not in all the jurisdictions where they overstepped their bounds.
386.
by rasengan 5y ago
There was a time when some used /etc/hosts whilst others used DNS. It was definitely a different time. Resolution issues with Handshake TLDs will easily be solved in time. There are, however, other reasons why one might think Ha
387.
by rasengan 5y ago
If you consider articles and research that the public paid for and suddenly don't have access to, to be piracy, then sure. To be clear, people have given their life for this cause.
388.
by rasengan 5y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_In_Our_Sites Keep in mind, they classify, for example 'scihub' as a piracy site [1] [1] https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/7/16618874/
389.
by rasengan 5y ago
Since then, they've shut down atleast 1 million if not more websites.
390.
US claims jurisdiction over all .com/.net sites even if outside the US (2011)(web.archive.org)
119 points by rasengan 5y ago|95 comments

More ›