ramoz

25 ms·

511.
by ramoz 1y ago
This is Claude Code. The two work really well with Gemini as a planner and Claude Code as an executor.
512.
by ramoz 1y ago
"Lock i-" At this point Claude Code is a software differentiator in the agent coding space. I am building things related to AI code assistants - we were hacking ways to integrate Claude Code - it was the first thing we wanted to b
513.
by ramoz 1y ago
For leukaemia. Another study is investigating the development of colon cancer.
514.
by ramoz 1y ago
I see it differently. Like a kid with legos. We had to tinker piece by piece to build a miniature castle. Over many hours. Now I can tinker concept by concept, and build much larger castles, much faster. Like waving a wand, seeing my though
515.
by ramoz 1y ago
Their GTM doesn't include a $ in front of their company acronym. I think there is similarity to https://www.anjuna.io/ and https://www.opaque.co/ here. I've heard of these, never iExec.
516.
by ramoz 1y ago
I've been using Gemini to shorten llms.txt and stick those in my repo. But what I find best - cloning doc sites directly into my repos in a root context folder. I have bash scripts for managing those, and I instruct Claude how to use t
517.
by ramoz 1y ago
Karpathy had a similar interesting take the other day https://x.com/karpathy/status/1921368644069765486
518.
by ramoz 1y ago
My speculation is that these companies have significant reason to prioritize lowering the amount of tokens produced as well as cost of tokens. The leaked Claude Code codebase was riddled with "concise", "do not add comments&q
519.
by ramoz 1y ago
I disagree with the idea that LLM providers are deliberately designing solutions to consume more tokens. We're in the early days of agentic coding, and the landscape is intensely competitive. Providers are focused on building highly ca
520.
by ramoz 1y ago
It's still Google.
521.
by ramoz 1y ago
also MCP bloat - I prefer my Claude Code agent raw. It has it's own capable tools and plans development with task lists now - works really well with a greater meta-level tasking and context orchestration.
522.
by ramoz 1y ago
same but the interaction between me and Claude is too dynamic, and my planning framework is more robust than single files. If anything I could speed my workflow up but writing a bash script that calls gemini for my plans - i feed entire cod
523.
by ramoz 1y ago
Building a product brewed in the alchemy of current-day LLMs is how we end up with new langchains.
524.
by ramoz 1y ago
Not open source but depending on certain context i can show whoever. im not hard to find. Ive done just about everything across the full & distributed stack. So I'm down to jam on my code/systems and how I instruct & rely
525.
by ramoz 1y ago
something like that. Think "paid more" as well
526.
by ramoz 1y ago
worth noting that some of the prompts are related to the project context management system i use: (obfuscated business details) https://gist.github.com/backnotprop/4a07a7e8fdd76cbe054761b9...
527.
by ramoz 1y ago
Ah yea sorry that is an export error... I copied prompts directly out of Claude Code and when I do that it copies all of the ascii/tui parts that wrap the message... I used some random "strip special chars" site to remove tho
528.
by ramoz 1y ago
Here is some insight... I had gemini obfuscate my business context so if something sounds weird it is probably because of that. https://gist.github.com/backnotprop/4a07a7e8fdd76cbe054761b9... The framework is basically
529.
by ramoz 1y ago
Not open source but depending on certain context i can show you. im not hard to find.
530.
by ramoz 1y ago
These aren't that fun but sure. - https://gist.github.com/backnotprop/ca49f356bdd2ab7bb7a366ef... - https://gist.github.com/backnotprop/d9f1d9f9b4379d6551ba967c... - https://gist.g
531.
by ramoz 1y ago
Doesn’t resonate with me because I’ve spent over $1,000 on Claude Code at this point and the return is worth it. The spend feels cheap compared to output. In contrast - I’m not interested in using cheaper, less-than, services for my livelih
532.
by ramoz 1y ago
Yes. For small apps, as well distributed systems. You have to puppeteer it and build a meta context/tasking management system. I spend a lot of time setting Claude code up for success. I usually start with Gemini for creating context,
533.
by ramoz 1y ago
I’m a traditional millennial brat - high preference for UI as well. That is until I started using Claude Code. It’s not about the terminal. It’s just a better UX in general.
534.
by ramoz 1y ago
Your second perspective captures my personal take. I feel indifferent about the actual ink at this point. It’s more about a personal/symbolic mark of who I am, who I was, maybe who I’ll be - all the same person. No regrets.
535.
by ramoz 1y ago
I don’t regret or fancy my decade old tattoos. They symbolize a past life to me basically, and that brings meaning and unique introspection to me in a way.
536.
by ramoz 1y ago
I think QOL will shift away from your keyboard. Give Claude Code a try and you’ll understand what I mean. Developer UX will shift away from traditional IDEs. At this point I could use notepad for the the type of manual work I do vs how I or
537.
by ramoz 1y ago
You forgot the best one to compare against - Claude Code.
538.
by ramoz 1y ago
I'm in LA and it's a very big trend here atm. My thought is some cultural influencers are leading the way but I'm not really in tune.
539.
by ramoz 1y ago
I spend the money on Claude Code, and don't think twice. I've spent low 1,000s at this point but the return is justified. I use Cursor when I code myself. But I don't use it's chat or agent features. I had replaced VS Co
540.
by ramoz 1y ago
Right wtf are we talking about. People are walking away with generational wealth.

More ›