What sloppy slop is that? > Labor is a resource, like water, and yet we do not drain the oceans with the same fervour as we employ people, trying to find a job

What sloppy slop is that? > Labor is a resource, like water, and yet we do not drain the oceans with the same fervour as we employ people, trying to find a job for every drop. This analogy doesn't make any sense! It is fake-poetic nonsense. > When we have implicit assumptions such as these, it drives our decision-making The implicit assumption that Labor is like an ocean? > That if we want more stuff, and better lives, everyone should be working harder? Every product we see around us, every service provided, is provided by paid or unpaid work. I would rather question that "more stuff equals better lives", but work equals stuff. > Here is a very simple statement which may sound a bit mean: it is entirely feasible that giving a job to a “stupid” person, regardless of how much we try and train them, might cost the economy more than we benefit, in aggregate. Disagree all you want on the definition of “stupid”, but you cannot deny that such a bar exists, There is virtually endless work to do. Even a a very stupid (not malicious) person can pick up trash from the street, dog walk doggies, dog sit Alzheimer patients, clean windows, etc. There are sheltered workshops to extract/provide (viewpoints differ) work out of literally intellectually disabled people, even if minimum wage has to be lowered to a single dollar per hour. It is a valid perspective from the worker to find "stupid" work not prestigious/fulfilling/boring, but it will create economic value.