rafark

18 ms·

61.
by rafark 2y ago
And charm.sh
62.
by rafark 2y ago
You said you’re buying from an unauthorized reseller because you don’t want to pay what they ask for. If you don’t agree with their prices that’s totally fine. But then why use their products? You want to use them but you don’t want to pay
63.
by rafark 2y ago
Not for booting but for processing (downloading files, processing a directory, waiting for an api, etc)
64.
by rafark 2y ago
So basically you just want the functionality without paying for it. > they overprice and they forget people use multiple plugins People who complain about the prices also forget that a lot of these plugins take months or years to develop
65.
by rafark 2y ago
> I can’t use [feature X], I need to support [old browser]. And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. As I commented a few days ago, nowadays devs don’t seem to care too much about backwards compatibility. I like to hold onto my devices lo
66.
by rafark 2y ago
Without a doubt it’s easier. But don’t we have more tools than before? Don’t companies & organizations have more employees/developers than before? Why are we getting less with more? I feel like there were higher standards in the jq
67.
by rafark 2y ago
I miss people caring about compatibility with older browsers. People even used to care about people who disabled JavaScript. Nowadays people seem to not gaf about older browsers. They somehow want everyone to be on the bleeding edge. What h
68.
by rafark 2y ago
It’s not completely different, it’s still mostly the same language with some big additions. If you read their dev blog, you’ll see they fixed a bug that was also present in php a few months ago.
69.
by rafark 2y ago
> React with its component ideas was a smart and the first of its kind, yes. Tldr: React is just a port (the original version). Just as an FYI, The main concepts of react were first created in PHP. It was called XHP and was latter ported
70.
by rafark 3y ago
They have to. I mean, google wants to sell ads. If the service (google search) was crap, less people would use it. Kind of like bing or the other search engines that barely anyone uses outside of a few tech circles. It’s not perfect but goo
71.
by rafark 3y ago
And that’s just Facebook. Pretty much everyone outside of the us depends on WhatsApp to communicate. From regular people to businesses.
72.
by rafark 3y ago
> I think not a lot You have to be kidding me right?
73.
by rafark 3y ago
> As someone who writes PHP and JS professionally every day, I think they're leagues apart. As someone who’s written a lot of php and JavaScript, I think the same thing but in the opposite way. JavaScript just can’t compare when it
74.
by rafark 3y ago
I made a similar comment a few weeks ago on another post about another site shutting down. It’s so sad how the internet has less and less “independent” sites and instead more people and organizations are just relying on the big names (YouTu
75.
by rafark 3y ago
Apple has been using + way before Disney. Apple care+, iPhone 6 Plus and I’m pretty sure they had another plus product or service in the 2000s or earlier that I’m forgetting right now. Edit: it was the Mac plus from 1986. I’ve always associ
76.
by rafark 3y ago
Me neither. But it seems like it’s another (at least formerly) independent site gone. It’s sad to see the modern web being dominated more and more by the big players (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, reddit, Amazon, etc). I’m not even old (I’m i
77.
by rafark 3y ago
I have a feeling this has to do with AI and all the lawsuits regarding content and copyright, storing and displaying the contents of a third party website to the end user might not be the best idea right now (I know the way back machine exi
78.
by rafark 3y ago
Do you have codecanyon plugins in your index?
79.
by rafark 3y ago
Checkout what? PHP also has support for FFI. Or am I missing something?
80.
by rafark 3y ago
There’s always (at least in this era) going to be a market for a could-based saas. Most companies are more than fine using a solid HTTP API and a lot of people (I’d say the majority) just need a nice ready to use web client. So I think they
81.
by rafark 3y ago
I love the idea/concept. I think it could gain more traction if you didn’t use the term hate and instead went for something more like “an alternative to python” or something like that.
82.
by rafark 3y ago
The way AIs are evolving, I wouldn’t be surprised if they have the ability to go to GitHub and search on demand based on a users query.
83.
by rafark 3y ago
I wonder if there’s a better alternative to current domain formats? Like, wouldnt it be great if you could just use your organization name without an extension? Like just google or apple or whatever. Instead of google.com or apple.com You c
84.
by rafark 3y ago
This is one of the weakest releases in like a decade. It’s disappointing that they delayed class getters and setters for another year. Php is my favorite language and would love to see more and more features. What I want the most is scalar
85.
by rafark 3y ago
Are you serious? https://gist.github.com/shapkarin/b3fbeaca95ef69df177b
86.
by rafark 3y ago
GPT 3.5 is VERY dumb when compared to GPT 4. Like, the difference is massive.
87.
by rafark 3y ago
You have to have a talent for that though. How many companies have made terrible purchases? Like him or hate him, Zuckerberg’s strategies have been great for his company. I don’t know about his VR business, but he’s like a Midas king when i
88.
by rafark 3y ago
You should use bing. It’s chatgpt-4 and it’s miles better than chatgpt-3. Bing even searches the web for answers. My only issue with being is that it’s extremely sensitive and will end a conversation for the most ridiculous things. But it’s
89.
by rafark 3y ago
It’s news because it’s rage bait.
90.
by rafark 3y ago
The game was actually close to ship without multiplayer, it was an afterthought. Some devs have talked about this (iirc, Marty O’Donnell was one of them).

More ›