Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rafaelmn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
481.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
True didn't consider that.
482.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
With the difference that you could get wiped out on the short ? Edit: I was wrong, if ETF has same amount of Tesla it should even out.
483.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
With nicest weather on the planet probably
484.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
That would require staying in one company for more than 2 years, which means you probably lost out on 20-30% of income over next 2 years.
485.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
I still have i9 2018 that will drain overnight in sleep mode, and that sleep discharge put the most battery cycles on the device. I think they only fixed it when they ditched the x86 ecosystem.
486.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Agreed, the only thing I would say here is that electrics kind of give you this torque/weight combo for an every day car so I would guess in the real world electric cars end up being worse on dust production. Hopefully tires can get op
487.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
That's not how VAT works in EU, when I'm buying stuff as business expenses from EU I need a reverse charge bill with my VAT ID and no VAT is applied on purchase. If I buy locally then I subtract the input when I'm paying my V
488.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
True, and you can do engine breaking and do milder acceleration curves in ICE car and that will significantly reduce the pad/tire wear. But if you drive like, I would speculate, most people do, Tesla will go through tires like a track
489.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Teslas eat tires for breakfast. Instant torque and high weight - any benefit you get from regen breaking is not scratching that.
490.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
You can say R1-604b to disambiguate, just like we have llama 3 8b/70b etc.
491.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
I recently saw a video by Sabine on this paper https://arxiv.org/html/2501.06623v1 that basically proposes blowing up a gigantic nuclear bomb in deep sea basalt deposit and basalt would capture the carbon. In the paper
492.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
These sound like ideal roles for bots/automation
493.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
I mean you do get slower with age so maybe that could explain it - personally I get nauseous working on 30hz (was stuck on this in a BnB once because of an old HDMI dongle), and that's like best case scenario for internet latency witho
494.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Except doing it over LAN vs Internet is a very different thing - editing over SSH with >100 ping is annoying as hell, especially if you have packet drops (like a mobile connection). Using a thin client editor with remote server is a much
495.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
>Remote editing does not work on Windows (its not implemented at all), so if you are on windows, you cannot ssh into anything with the editor remote editing feature. This means you cannot use your PC as a thin client to the actual chunky
496.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Feels like a page of graphs where Anthropic team discovers that Claude is the best coding model and is used mostly by devs. And they have no penetration in general population compared to OpenAI
497.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
I mean I still fail to see how comparing these three scenarios - genetic twins separated at birth - genetic siblings raised in same household - genetically unrelated same age siblings adopted in the same household are teasing out anything b
498.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
First one that comes to mind is The Blank Slate from Pinker, but I have read that like 15 years ago. But it did shape my view on the subject and I have seen this topic come up many times since. I don't remember anyone disputing strong
499.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Something more specific ? Couldn't find anything directly saying what you're claiming here. I was interested if my info was out of date so I found this https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii&#x
500.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
> Split twins does the opposite: separated twins IQ-test outcomes track the SES of the families they go to. Consider me convinced if you can source this - I'm not finding anything but opposite - that they strongly correlate the olde
501.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Split twins strongly backs genetic component, and heritability is also significant. There's nothing to dispell, environment does seem to be a factor in negative direction, so that's undoubtedly a big factor as well. But low IQ peo
502.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
It's also significantly genetically determined (twin studies) so in this case I meant genetic heritability. Also for some reason people seem to think I'm making a comment about high IQ and elitism. I think low IQ is far more impor
503.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Your own source says >Previous research, discussed below, has investigated the relationship between intelligence and income and found individuals with higher IQ test scores have higher income. and my comment says >there's plenty
504.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
> Unless you are a social Darwinist who believe the poor are genetically worse… This is guaranteed to be a strong factor, there's plenty of evidence on IQ heritability and correlation with income. Just because it doesn't predic
505.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Inconsistency comes from scaling - if you are optimizing your infra to be cos effective you will arrive at same tradeoffs. Not saying it's not nice to be able to make some of those decisions on your own - but if you're picking LLM
506.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
But that is where servo can fill the niche, focus on modern/fast parts, ignore legacy compatibility.
507.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
>Why would an "embedded browser engine" be any better? Electron after all is also a browser engine, and that's what makes it slow and bloated compared to native UI, not the embedded part (by which I asume you mean somethin
508.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
Yes this is the ideal space for a performance minded web rendering engine rewrite. And if you do it well enough as a subset it can become the next standard where the modern web is just the subset, you can even integrate it with a legacy re
509.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
This only works for small self-contained problems with narrow scope/context. Chat sucks for pulling in context, and the only worse thing I've tried is the IDE integrations that supposedly pull the relevant context for you (and I&#
510.
▲
by
rafaelmn
2y ago
You get functions that are easily testable in isolation with all state provided in parameters. You also get explicit dependencies and scoping controlled by caller. I don't mind globals but saying you get nothing for avoiding them is :&
More ›