3 ms·
Feels like a page of graphs where Anthropic team discovers that Claude is the best coding model and is used mostly by devs. And they have no penetration in gene
by rafaelmn 2y ago
Feels like a page of graphs where Anthropic team discovers that Claude is the best coding model and is used mostly by devs. And they have no penetration in general population compared to OpenAI
- mlinhares 2y agoRead it as that as well, I think this mixes the "there is no penetration in that market" with "we have not been able to get these people to use our tools".
- hall0ween 2y agoDoes OpenAI have similar data available to compare to?
- CL_ergo 2y agoI laughed out loud at their chart showing that Sonnet had a higher share of coding questions, whereas Opus had more writing. If they would just look at their product, they'd see that it literally says it in the model description that Opus is better for writing. If you advertise one of your models as geared for task X, the insight that people use it more for task X isn't really an insight.