Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
racional
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
421.
▲
White House Worries Russia's Momentum Is Changing Trajectory of Ukraine War
(nytimes.com)
7 points
by
racional
2y ago
|
0 comments
422.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
It's absolutely just a country like us, the fact that you need to ask a question like this ... Actually it's a very different place. And this seems to be one of the missing pieces of your analysis here.
423.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
The "guess my Easter egg" interview pattern. As if this what they do all day: ask each other fundamentally useless questions with no meaningful answer (that anyone would actually care about), and which you aren't expected to
424.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Mostly they're not being done at scale for the very sensible reason that it is cheaper to replace emitting processes. In other words - they just don't work at present.
425.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Putin has declared very recently he's open to dialogue, but as you may know ... His minimum requirement is permanent recognized sovereignty for the areas he's currently sitting on (and likely then some), as you may know. Do you
426.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
"Can be mitigated" -- how, exactly? No one has an answer to that question, at present (in terms of solutions that work at scale, and without unsustainable secondary effects). Which brings us back to the subject of the article -- m
427.
▲
The rise and fall of Ashley Madison: 'People lost their lives'
(theguardian.com)
3 points
by
racional
2y ago
|
0 comments
428.
▲
'Magical thinking': hopes for sustainable jet fuel not realistic, report finds
(theguardian.com)
7 points
by
racional
2y ago
|
8 comments
429.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Lots of tit-for-tat here. You were attributing to me views which I haven't expressed. So a correction was provided, which was hopefully helpful to you. In any case it seems we've traded enough notes about historical bloodletti
430.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
It sounds you are basically advocating for the Decisive Plan as put forth by the current Minister of Finance. Am I reading you correctly, here? Do you have a sense as to what portion of the non-Arab population in Israel would support such a
431.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
I thank what matters now is what the West does now, and in the upcoming years. Other than that we seem to be broadly on the same page. I appreciate your robust counterpoints to the misinformation that gets continually posted here.
432.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
I know all about 2014, from people who were there. There was no "crisis" that provided any rational reason for Russia to intervene with force (either at the time, or after Ukraine's failure to "solve" it in subseq
433.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
That's what Putin said were his reasons. Does that mean they actually were the reasons?
434.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Disagree as to worst case. We just don't know how the Yushchenko government (let alone whoever his successor may have been after 2010) would have handled the situation. And without sufficient time to integrate properly -- the accessio
435.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
"to do exactly that to its", " in Afghanistan", "that the project"
436.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Germany and France blocked it, indirectly making the war in 2014 and this one possible. Well, that's speculative. If the move had been green-lighted it could have triggered a spontaneous kinetic/punitive action of some sort (as
437.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
If you wanted to prevent the invasion of 2022, you should've solved the 2014 crisis diplomatically, the invasion was a result of a failure in doing so. The invasion started in 2014, not 2022. There was no "diplomatic crisis"
438.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Because you saw it on the news? It's self-evident from their statements and their actions. Combined with even a basic understanding of regional history. It's a fantasy to think you can push out half a million Russian soldiers
439.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Russia knows [war is costly], why would it want to make things even worse? Because its leadership is deranged, and is willing to put a large chunk of its population through a wood chopper (and endure decades of blunted growth and economic
440.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
If you do not believe that the State of Israel should exist I never said that either.
441.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Many emigrate to Palestine in eastern Jordan because they feel a connection to the land their great grandparents grew up in, it's worth the tradeoff for them (assuming it's less prosperous than Israel which of course may be inver
442.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
the obvious real answer to peace ... is for Jordan to designate a chunk. And then what needs to happen, specifically? Tell us more, please.
443.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
The key part of Leaf's acknowledgment (which came some weeks after what Biden said) is where she added that the US has sources from a "variety of folks who are on the ground". Meaning they had independent confirmation that h
444.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
Your central thesis that Israelis are pure, unadulterated evil It's not my thesis, and nothing I've written even remotely suggests that.
445.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
You have to scroll down to 1939 before finding the first instance of Jewish retaliation. There's also this fellow Menachem Begin and the accomplishments of his crew: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_at
446.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
In this purely hypothetical universe -- in which the Israeli government was acting in an at least arguably rational fashion in regard to securing a timely release of the hostages, and protecting the security of citizens otherwise; in which
447.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
This is just a rare edge case I guess it is worth ignoring it. The local decree is in clear violation of Articles 1 and 5 of the Grundgesetz in any case. Which was specifically designed to prevent bullying of sort. In particular there&#x
448.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
So where exactly did you pull this quote from? The very same document you were dissecting - the 1988 charter. The phrases are easy to find in any reliable translation you have handy. Just look for keywords like "Judgement", &q
449.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
It was definitely a dorky question, and a glaring sign of the interviewer's lack of maturity to blithely burn through your precious time in this manner. But if you're going to play Google's game, this what you're going t
450.
▲
by
racional
2y ago
So it's okay to silence this segment of the Jewish population, and deny them citizenship rights in Germany (of all places) if they are "seen as weirdos among other Jews"? That's what you're advocating, apparently.
More ›