r-zip

8 ms·

31.
by r-zip 4y ago
I saw that. Not exactly a great reason.
32.
by r-zip 4y ago
Why do you need microphone access? Can't you use text instead? I'm not giving mic access to some random website.
33.
by r-zip 4y ago
> non-medically trained physician associates (PA) This is not always true. I'm not sure what the requirements are, but my wife is a PA and she basically went through the first year of medical school and did several hospital rotation
34.
by r-zip 4y ago
I think probably any post-hoc explanations will be wrong. Explainability needs to be built into the model from the outset.
35.
by r-zip 4y ago
I agree with you--let me throw in my experience. In my first dev job, I was 26 (not super young, but also not old). We used Clojure, but I had only programmed C, Python, and Matlab up to that point. It took me a month or two to really grok
36.
by r-zip 4y ago
This is great. I submitted my first claim form a couple of weeks ago and was dumbfounded by how difficult it was! Great job.
37.
by r-zip 4y ago
Yeah, the video was way too long for the actual content.
38.
by r-zip 4y ago
In my experience, people use appropriate tools for the job. Most data scientists won't reach for a neural network if the problem can be solved by other, simpler means.
39.
by r-zip 4y ago
I gave it a shot and several things were broken. It's a nice idea, but definitely needs more polishing.
40.
by r-zip 5y ago
I was wondering the same. Without better y-axis labeling, it's not that informative of a graphic.
41.
by r-zip 5y ago
Hidden message in the bolded characters: "help they have bastien"
42.
by r-zip 5y ago
> L1 regularization has to do with minimizing error of absolute values Not quite. It has to do with minimizing the sum of absolute values of the coefficients , not the error. The squared error is still the "fidelity" term in t
43.
by r-zip 5y ago
Claude Shannon*
44.
by r-zip 5y ago
The term "symbol" is indeed used in that context as well, but that's not what I took Marcus to mean in the article. Maybe I'm missing something?
45.
by r-zip 5y ago
By this (I think) the author just means logical rules. Think regular software.
46.
by r-zip 5y ago
Did you ever consider that explaining how deep nets "learn in practice" is not the point?
47.
by r-zip 5y ago
There is more to it than the libraries both companies create. FB has facilitated various societal issues (surveillance advertising, conspiracy theory spreading/radicalization, depression in younger users, etc.), but Apple for the most
48.
by r-zip 5y ago
Living that long is not guaranteed.
49.
by r-zip 5y ago
How well does this play with virtual environments?
50.
by r-zip 5y ago
I don't know about journalists, but given the idiotic replies to the posts of the computer scientists I follow on Twitter, I'm not sure I blame them for producing content for other top computer scientists.
51.
by r-zip 5y ago
Can you elaborate on these "other cases" with multiple rounds where logarithmic utility doesn't make sense?
52.
by r-zip 5y ago
Because the Result and Maybe types in the examples are functors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functor_(functional_programmin...
53.
by r-zip 5y ago
Too bad it's tied to a single editor.
54.
by r-zip 5y ago
I agree it's nice, but Helix's default LSP for Python is unusably slow, having used pyright with Vim/Emacs/VS Code. I tried setting up the pyright language server to work with Helix, but could not get it to work. It will
55.
by r-zip 5y ago
There are efforts in that direction: https://leanprover.github.io/theorem_proving_in_lean4/
56.
by r-zip 5y ago
I found Emacs could keep up after the gccemacs update.
57.
by r-zip 5y ago
> * R^2 of play time and well begin is 0.01. Technically significant. Wow, that's complete garbage!
58.
by r-zip 5y ago
As another commenter said, speed of experimentation is an important factor. Also, dynamic types are nice when you're dealing with exploratory data work. Combine that with the library ecosystem and Python's ease of use, and there y
59.
by r-zip 5y ago
Well, it is slightly different than multiplying two scalars: c = a * b vs C = A @ B
60.
by r-zip 5y ago
For some reason I read this as Futurama projections.

More ›