questionimp

4 ms·

1.
by questionimp 15y ago
If the fact that they now have a license devalues the value of the original contract you signed for (I am assuming) exclusive rights, then that is why you have the right of first refusal in your contract. Thanks for putting it that way,
2.
by questionimp 15y ago
Yes, however there is something like a commission/bonus that is associated with the work too, so depending on how much my company is working, we get more revenues above the guaranteed level of income.
3.
by questionimp 15y ago
OP here. In my case, that is essentially what it is. Cooperate or I'll kill you. It can even just read I can kill you, so I will. That is why I am really unsure about cannibalizing my own baby by not killing them, but I am very unsure wheth
4.
by questionimp 15y ago
If we are satisfying our contractual obligation, and shipping what the clients want, how could a competitor make a case using "damaged sales"? Isn't that like saying that I start a cola company and say Pizza Hut is damaging my sales by sell
5.
by questionimp 15y ago
I have a five year contract with my customer, that guarantees a level of income, so I am not worried about that. Plus, the payout is really nice if they cancel my contract, so that is not something that I am that worried about. Also, I am n
6.
by questionimp 15y ago
No. Its like having official rights to screen the football game. I signed a 5 year contract that had a right of first refusal so there isn't any thing to do with goodwill. And I have a fixed income contract that gets adjusted as per market
7.
Ask HN: Should I kill my competitor legally?
9 points by questionimp 15y ago|21 comments