qualeed

8 ms·

31.
by qualeed 1y ago
While I understand each of the words you have written, I have no idea what you are trying to say. What would you suggest I do with this information? I get the impression that you were trying for something cryptic and profound sounding, but
32.
by qualeed 1y ago
Not only does that not even come close to aligning with the original claim, as barbazoo points out, but there is also a difference between having a "positive view of the military" and wanting to partner with them at work.
33.
by qualeed 1y ago
PBS Spacetime had an episode somewhat recently about a black hole which is growing at many (hundreds? thousands? I forget) times the Eddington Limit. And, as far as I remember, it isn't the only one to exceed the Eddington Limit - just
34.
by qualeed 1y ago
> but from what I gather, this lady seems like a pain in the a I didn't get this impression at all, why do you think the lady is a pain in the ass..?
35.
by qualeed 1y ago
> During that visit, I was told that children could never be left alone, inside or outside the home—EVEN IN THEIR OWN BEDROOMS—until they were 13 years old. Social Services said specifically that I had to be in each room with them at all
36.
by qualeed 1y ago
> Why would you not want people trusting their data with SaaS apps? Mainly because after years and years (and hundreds and hundreds) of data leaks & breaches... every single person would be significantly better off by defaulting to
37.
by qualeed 1y ago
There's a ton of little things like this (e.g. you also should consider not using bookmarks, or at least avoiding obscure ones). A good overview is available at https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Tor_Browser#Unsafe_Tor_Br
38.
by qualeed 1y ago
Right, but the question was "why would you need to obscure your identity from the exit nodes" , in the context of why the person chose Tor vs. a simple proxy.
39.
by qualeed 1y ago
It is a bit funny that you said " see how it works out ", I told you I already do it, so you go with a dismissive " Good for you " Anyways, I doubt anything I can say will ever convince you otherwise, you sound very entr
40.
by qualeed 1y ago
They were concerned about the exit node identifying them, not the site identifying that a Tor exit node is connecting.
41.
by qualeed 1y ago
So that the exit node can't go to the site they were scraping and say "this is the person scraping your site".
42.
by qualeed 1y ago
There is partial mitigation for RAPTOR: Counter-RAPTOR from 2017 ( https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=795... ) with mostly the same authors. I haven't kept up with the space much since then
43.
by qualeed 1y ago
It's on by default in Tor browser. You have to explicitly switch to "Safest" mode to turn it off completely. > Why does Tor Browser ship with JavaScript enabled? We configure NoScript to allow JavaScript by default in To
44.
by qualeed 1y ago
For a guide that goes into so much detail (as far as suggesting enterprise-grade drives, recommended RAID configurations, etc.), not even a passing mention of Tails or Qubes-Whonix is a really interesting choice (read: discouraging omission
45.
by qualeed 1y ago
Figuring out someone is using Tor is trivial (e.g. list of exit node IPs https://www.dan.me.uk/torlist/?exit ). This mitigation helps protect the individual Tor user (e.g. with a unique 1726x907 px window) being finge
46.
by qualeed 1y ago
You may find it unfathomable to do so, but I already donate quite a bit more than 2.5% of my salary, as well as hours of my time every week, helping people less fortunate than myself. Whatever "reality" you're referring to is
47.
by qualeed 1y ago
You say: > .5% of wealth also means non-liquid assets such as house But they said: > Total U.S. household net worth (excluding real estate) The rest of your comment, to be honest, just sounds like you fundamentally don't like p
48.
by qualeed 1y ago
> One in 7,000 people, according to his unpublished analysis
49.
by qualeed 1y ago
> But we shouldn’t paint it like I was bailed out by some algorithmic PR radar and nothing else. > [...] assumed to be manipulation I think you're reading way more negativity into "PR" than I'm intending (which i
50.
by qualeed 1y ago
Money is typically much easier to deal with than data or account restoration. With that said, it's nice to hear a good support story every now and then! People don't usually take the time to write a blog post (or comment, etc.) wh
51.
by qualeed 1y ago
> but that doesn't mean it was just a PR move by Amazon Being a PR move isn't inherently a bad thing. The bad thing is the lack of support when PR isn't at risk. > It's fair to say that without the blog post this
52.
by qualeed 1y ago
> So no, it wasn’t PR-driven in the reactive sense. At my small business, we proactively monitor blogs and forums for mentions of our company name so that we can head off problems before they become big. I'm extremely confident tha
53.
by qualeed 1y ago
Awesome that the author got their stuff back. But... > My data is back. Not because of viral pressure. Not because of bad PR. [...] > “I am devastated to read on your blog about the deletion of your AWS data. I did want to reach out
54.
by qualeed 1y ago
Not just people who don't speak English as a first language. I was recently linked a list of 1,000+ words that "shouldn't be used" because they're "evidence" of AI. Oh, and if you use bullet points, obviou
55.
by qualeed 1y ago
You seem to know more about this than me, so what about the " aircraft movement logs " part? I would think it'd be hard to copy that to the pilots ahead of time, given you haven't logged it yet. (Or am I misunderstanding
56.
by qualeed 1y ago
I'm guessing the system handled sensitive/critical flight information: > The system manages flight information like crew scheduling, weight-and-balance calculations, and aircraft movement logs.
57.
by qualeed 1y ago
This would probably be better suited under the original comment so that the original commenter has a better chance of seeing/reading it.
58.
by qualeed 1y ago
> The burden of proof is [...] Sometimes we can just talk about things without having to pretend we're in a court of law or defending our phd thesis. Original commenter wasn't asking for anyone to prove anything, or trying to
59.
by qualeed 1y ago
This is a pretty good example of what parent comment was referencing, I think. You say " Asimov’s three laws are not a good framework. ", then don't present any arguments to why it is not a good framework. Instead you bring u
60.
by qualeed 1y ago
I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make, but generating and distributing non-consensual nudes is already "obviously prohibited" (by law) in many jurisdictions. It is also explicitly prohibited by twitter&#x2

More ›