3 ms·
You say: >.5% of wealth also means non-liquid assets such as house But they said: >Total U.S. household net worth (excluding real estate) The rest of your c
by qualeed 1y ago
You say:
>.5% of wealth also means non-liquid assets such as house
But they said:
>Total U.S. household net worth (excluding real estate)
The rest of your comment, to be honest, just sounds like you fundamentally don't like poor people and have some strong biases against them.
- NotGMan 1y agoYou are free to give them 2.5% of your money, see how it works out. Reality supports my case.
- qualeed 1y agoYou may find it unfathomable to do so, but I already donate quite a bit more than 2.5% of my salary, as well as hours of my time every week, helping people less fortunate than myself. Whatever "reality" you're referring to isn't the same one I'm living in.
- NotGMan 1y agoGood for you. Doesn't change the reality that most of them don't know how to handle money.
- qualeed 1y agoIt is a bit funny that you said "see how it works out", I told you I already do it, so you go with a dismissive "Good for you" Anyways, I doubt anything I can say will ever convince you otherwise, you sound very entrenched in your beliefs.