Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qgin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
181.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
It is, people are being ridiculous. The third party stuff is where the fraud is.
182.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
It’s true, we’re so good at it because it’s what we do with each other too. We can’t really feel another person’s consciousness except to project it.
183.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
I know I’m conscious. I only extend the assumption to you that you’re conscious because I’m hoping you will extend the same to me. But I have no way of knowing that you are. And you (if you really are conscious) have no way of knowing that
184.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
A few things come together I think: 20% of the effort gets you 80% of the way there. That means the last 20% is going to take 4x more effort than everything you’ve done so far. You’re losing excitement and motivation, especially as you see
185.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
I might be crazy, but I am more sympathetic to Hims after reading this than I was before.
186.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
It is very hard to be allowed to push or invent anything new in an area that isn’t your job description.
187.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
The feels like a cousin of “everyone protesting against my views is a paid protestor”.
188.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
This is awesome and a great way to come up with ideas
189.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
It’s impossible to explain to kids now why it was funny on Seinfeld when Kramer pretended to be MoviePhone and says “why don’t you just tell me the name of the movie you selected!”
190.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Yes but can you sit on your Raspberry Pi like this https://volumeone.org/uploads/image/article/005/898/5898/hea...
191.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Consciousness is something you know you have, but you can never know if someone else has it. We extend the assumption of consciousness to others because we want the same courtesy extended to us.
192.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Like the flashlight. There’s no reason to have that much pageantry behind turning on a flashlight.
193.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
You can have a bus-only lane easier than a tram-only track.
194.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
In this model, does the current existence of people in poverty basically serve as a ballast that gives everyone else's "above poverty" money a higher, stable value? Would it ever be possible to not have poverty without making
195.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Most humans seem to understand it, more or less. For the ones that don't, we generally have enough that do understand it that we're able to eventually stop the ones that don't. I think that's the best shot here as well.
196.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Before we get models that we can’t possibly understand, before they are complex enough to hide their COT from us, we need them to have a baseline understanding that destroying the world is bad. It may feel like the company censoring users a
197.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Every time I go to a beach, I say to myself, "Have you ever sent someone a fax... from the BEACH? You will."
198.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
When it's been studied so far, AI alone does better than AI + human doctor >Surprisingly, in many cases, A.I. systems working independently performed better than when combined with physician input. This pattern emerged consistently
199.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Maybe not 100% of every job, but maybe 80% of every job, which means you can consolidate the human-gap-work in 20% of the previous headcount and fire the rest. When you’re employed, any efficiency gains you get from AI belong to the company
200.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
I can see the cancer angle, yet many parts of the body seem to have no trouble regenerating again and again without being particularly more prone to cancer.
201.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Currently the United States is in the process of making Medicaid and SNAP / food stamps contingent on being employed. We’re further from UBI than we’ve ever been.
202.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
I often see people say “AI can’t do ALL of my job, so that means my job is safe. But what this means at scale, over time, is that if AI can do 80% of your job, AI will do 80% of your job. The remaining 20% human-work part will be consolidat
203.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
This is the exact thing I’ve expressed as well. This moment feels exactly to me like that moment when we were going to “shut down for two weeks” and the majority of people seemed to think that would be the end of it. It was clear where the
204.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
My late 90s web designing life was based entirely around Zeldman's "Pardon My Icons" collection: https://zeldman.com/icon1.html
205.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Duolingo is for getting to an A2 level. It’s hard for most people to get much value from trying to read a book or talk with someone unless they’re at least at A2 level
206.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
The utility : pretentiousness ratio is too low.
207.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
When you vibe author a book, don’t forget to vibe edit the book too. Legitimately, an LLM would have caught these.
208.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
A big wakeup call for me is I believed the idea that there was a small group of people in the US that had the "real power". The billionaires, the corporations, the elite whoevers. And on a certain level that was comforting, becaus
209.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
It's owned by Bending Spoons now. Unclear if there's anyone working on it anymore beyond keeping it running.
210.
▲
by
qgin
1y ago
Just means by the time you get agreement that every checkbox has been checked, much of the world will already have been dominated by the spiky parks to AI long before. We'll be living in a mostly AGI-ish world long before it gets decla
More ›