5 ms·
Duolingo is for getting to an A2 level. It’s hard for most people to get much value from trying to read a book or talk with someone unless they’re at least at A
by qgin 1y ago
Duolingo is for getting to an A2 level. It’s hard for most people to get much value from trying to read a book or talk with someone unless they’re at least at A2 level
- whyowhy3484939 1y agoThat's bad news for the millions that had to do just that and learned fine in fact better. I'm not saying you should read the Upanishads in the original, I'm saying a proper intro textbook is fine and some teacher-figure ("human") to actually use your body and read theirs. Heck, Latin even has a Latin-only method: LLPSI. "Roma in Italia est", you'll figure it out quickly enough.
- pjc50 1y agoHumans are (very) expensive and Duolingo is free if you can put up with the advertising.
- watwut 1y agoAs someone who had to learn languages from textbooks back when it was the only thing that existed, it was massively ineffective way of learning. The typical outcome was a person who spent a lot of effort and still was unable to do anything useful with the language after years (reading real book, watching movie, chatting).
- whyowhy3484939 1y agoNotice I included interaction with people, but you're right. I think just using books is about equal to just using apps. Both won't get you there but books will get you further along the way.
- pessimizer 1y agohttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=graded+readers https://duckduckgo.com/?q=graded+readers https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dual+language+book https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dual+language+book https://duckduckgo.com/?q=comic+book https://duckduckgo.com/?q=comic+book
- xrtatee 1y ago[flagged]