qcl820DV34

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by qcl820DV34 18d ago

   Lots of bold statements, zero arguments except the usual fear mongering. "Think of the children!!!" Hyphanet (formerly Freenet) works, people are actually using it. Meanwhile, almost every single day there is news on hackernews ab
2. 2.▲
   by qcl820DV34 5mo ago

   Repeating a bad decision does not make it any wiser.
3. 3.▲
   by qcl820DV34 5mo ago

   The issue is that the original name, "Freenet", was repurposed for a different codebase.
4. 4.▲
   by qcl820DV34 5mo ago

   > Incorrect, I raised the issue with the lead maintainer over a year prior to that announcement. The previous lead maintainer, Steve, voiced their frustration with your decision here: https://www.mail-archive.com/devl@fre
5. 5.▲
   by qcl820DV34 5mo ago

   > and after over a year of debate There was no "year of debate". You came to the mailing list and announced it for the first time as a finalized decision already, without any prior debate with the original team. The "board
6. 6.▲
   by qcl820DV34 5mo ago

   Extremely depraved things are not the only thing to use freedom of speech for, and freely speaking can result in all kinds of repressions. And even without agreeing on whether people should be anonymous on the Internet, it could be agreed t
7. 7.▲
   by qcl820DV34 5mo ago

   Notably this project was conceived by a backroom decision to dump the original Freenet development team's work, in favor of a rewrite from different developers, without asking anyone on the original team. It was an ivory tower decision