pylua

12 ms·

421.
by pylua 3y ago
The only issue I have with that is that they will not allow us citizens to live there and take on jobs. If it truly were free trade then we could choose to live there and accept a lesser salary. Eventually offshoring to South America will p
422.
by pylua 3y ago
The world where good enough / more cpu resources and just works is easier to get to than design the system in a logical way.
423.
by pylua 3y ago
It will need to be tied in with a real abet engineering discipline the future , at least domestically.
424.
by pylua 3y ago
They might if the tax base decreases substantially and unemployment shoots up to unsustainable levels. The government definitely cannot afford , with the national debt, to lose tax dollars or to subsidize high levels of unemployment.
425.
by pylua 3y ago
I do not understand how we got to this point. India is not in the U.S. sphere of influence and has not even voted to condemn Russia. It’s really a sign of how weak the U.S. government has become, which is heartbreaking. US has found it too
426.
by pylua 3y ago
Here is maybe an uncomfortable truth for software engineers: it’s more efficient from a cost perspective to just something out there that is good enough, even if it makes no logical sense and is a mess. Maintainability and readability are b
427.
by pylua 3y ago
The U.S. government should be concerned. The U.S. tax base could very well implode with outsourcing, ai, and offshoring in the next 10 years.
428.
by pylua 3y ago
Put that c3p0 on a website that gets revenues from views and someone is getting paid.
429.
by pylua 3y ago
The U.S. tax base may implode if that is the case.
430.
by pylua 3y ago
What is RAG?
431.
by pylua 3y ago
This is a complete disaster. On the other hand, are there any companies focusing on tuning llm or plugins to help with legal research and verification of research? Is that even possible? The scale and size of the law really does necessitate
432.
by pylua 3y ago
Anything? I tried to send money to someone but the button did not debounce the request and I ended up with more than one payment ?
433.
by pylua 3y ago
Would windows or whatever host operating system be liable potentially for the programs running on it even if they are open sourced programs?
434.
by pylua 3y ago
Some bugs are one in a million and may not be easily reproduced. How would you prove it’s not one of those?
435.
by pylua 3y ago
The article says that someone is liable. So if a user directly uses open source would the open source maintainers be liable? Would it be the operating systems company for allowing the software to run? It’s very unclear.
436.
by pylua 3y ago
There is nothing preventing scammers from modifying the software once they receive it then saying it is faulty. Especially with web technologies but even with desktop applications too.
437.
by pylua 3y ago
The article says it is not clear who provides relief if the user directly uses open source with no middle man. That is the most concerning part for me.
438.
by pylua 3y ago
GitHubs next feature: litigation tracker.
439.
by pylua 3y ago
This is a good explanation, thank you. I would argue that their purpose is not to circumvent copyright, however.
440.
by pylua 3y ago
I am looking at it from the perspective of someone using mid journey to generate the image, not the company itself. What if I want to use midjourney to reimagine a new scene between to scenes to prove whatever social issue I want to blog ab
441.
by pylua 3y ago
I am not a lawyer but adding your own items and creating a hypothetical scenes seems more like fair use than the reaction videos on youtube do? Or, is that a different ballgame altogether? Curious to find out. I am not a lawyer.
442.
by pylua 3y ago
I feel like an artist should be more upset with what could be created from the prompt that was not true to the original film, with only minor changes to the prompt. For instance, a picture of batman and joker having drinks together on the r
443.
by pylua 3y ago
Does us law prohibit selling machines or services that potentially can perform copyright infringement?
444.
by pylua 3y ago
Duplication without attribution? Wasn't the attribution in the prompt?
445.
by pylua 3y ago
That doesn't look like a screenshot from the movie. It looks like a hypothetical screenshot at different angles.
446.
by pylua 3y ago
Seems like you could easily add a couple of adjectives / adverbs to make a completely new scene from the movie and it may be considered fair use?
447.
by pylua 3y ago
The picture in the article is a lot more than drawing a caped super hero after watching batman. Not to mention that the access to viewing batman for the inspiration is usually behind some sort of compensation. I would argue that original cr
448.
by pylua 3y ago
What regulations are you referring to that we can remove ?
449.
by pylua 3y ago
It’s not ostensibly a free market. It’s not a free market at all. They’re are also many parts not worth preserving for many reasons.
450.
by pylua 3y ago
Even Santa was rude to donner and Rudolph when he first found out.

More ›